Literature DB >> 20627432

Diagnostic performance of response assessment FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with high-precision definitive (chemo)radiation.

Tejpal Gupta1, Sandeep Jain, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Venkatesh Rangarajan, Nilendu Purandare, Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar, Ketayun A Dinshaw.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess diagnostic performance of response assessment fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients with HNSCC treated with high-precision definitive (chemo)radiation.
METHODS: Fifty-seven patients treated on a prospective clinical trial having post-treatment response assessment FDG-PET/CT scans were included. Clinico-pathologic findings and follow-up information was considered as reference standard.
RESULTS: First response assessment FDG-PET/CT was done at a median of 9 weeks (inter-quartile range 8-10 weeks) from completion of treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of first response assessment FDG-PET/CT for identifying residual disease at primary site was 50%, 91.8%, 50%, 91.8%, and 86%. The corresponding figures for the neck were 62.5%, 98%, 83.3%, 94.1%, and 93%. With a median follow-up of 26 months (range 7-45 months), the 3-year loco-regional control (83.9% vs 58.3%, p=0.001) and overall survival (68.8% vs 58.3%, p=0.063) was significantly better in patients with negative response assessment scans.
CONCLUSION: The overall diagnostic accuracy of response assessment FDG-PET/CT is good, but its sensitivity and PPV is somewhat low, particularly for primary site. A negative response assessment FDG-PET/CT scan is highly suggestive of absence of viable disease that could be used to guide decision-making.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20627432     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  17 in total

Review 1.  The role of FDG PET-CT in the therapeutic evaluation for HNSCC patients.

Authors:  Joji Kawabe; Shigeaki Higashiyama; Atsushi Yoshida; Kohei Kotani; Susumu Shiomi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Zubin Master; Sadhana Kannan; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Functional imaging in radiation therapy planning for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Luis A Pérez Romasanta; María José García Velloso; Antonio López Medina
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-11-09

Review 4.  Role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck oncology: the point of view of the radiation oncologist.

Authors:  Jon Cacicedo; Arturo Navarro; Olga Del Hoyo; Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga; Filippo Alongi; Jose A Medina; Olgun Elicin; Andrea Skanjeti; Francesco Giammarile; Pedro Bilbao; Francisco Casquero; Berardino de Bari; Alan Dal Pra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The role of positron emission tomography/CT imaging in head and neck cancer patients after radical chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  J M Sherriff; B Ogunremi; S Colley; P Sanghera; A Hartley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Change of maximum standardized uptake value slope in dynamic triphasic [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography distinguishes malignancy from postradiation inflammation in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Carryn M Anderson; Tangel Chang; Michael M Graham; Michael D Marquardt; Anna Button; Brian J Smith; Yusuf Menda; Wenqing Sun; Nitin A Pagedar; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Positron emission tomography for neck evaluation following definitive treatment with chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Voichita Bar-Ad; Mark Mishra; Nitin Ohri; Charles Intenzo
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2012-02

8.  Reliability of post-chemoradiotherapy F-18-FDG PET/CT for prediction of locoregional failure in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Matthew E Spector; Matthew H Stenmark; Carol R Bradford; Gregory T Wolf; Francis P Worden; Douglas B Chepeha; Jonathan B McHugh; Thomas Carey; Ka Kit Wong; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.337

9.  Definitive radiochemotherapy or initial surgery for oropharyngeal cancer : To what extent can p16 expression be used in the decision process?

Authors:  Anouchka Modesto; Thibaut Galissier; Amélie Lusque; Jean-Pierre Delord; Emmanuelle Uro-Coste; Jérôme Sarini; Frédéric Mouchet; Raphaël Lopez; Anne Laprie; Pierre Graff; Sébastien Vergez; Michel Rives
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  The predictive value of treatment response using FDG PET performed on day 21 of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A prospective, multicentre study (RTEP3).

Authors:  Odré Palie; Pierre Michel; Jean-François Ménard; Caroline Rousseau; Emmanuel Rio; Boumédiene Bridji; Ahmed Benyoucef; Marc-Etienne Meyer; Khadija Jalali; Stéphane Bardet; Che Mabubu M'vondo; Pierre Olivier; Guillaume Faure; Emmanuel Itti; Christian Diana; Claire Houzard; Françoise Mornex; Frederic Di Fiore; Pierre Vera
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.