Literature DB >> 2062497

Long-term outcome after corneal transplantation. Visual result and patient perception of success.

K A Williams1, J K Ash, P Pararajasegaram, S Harris, D J Coster.   

Abstract

Snellen acuity, reading line, and keratometry were measured in a cohort of 60 patients at 2 or more years after penetrating keratoplasty was performed. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire to elicit information on their perceptions of visual function and the success of the procedure. Using preferred correction, a Snellen acuity of 6/18 or better was achieved by 65%, and a reading line of N8 or better was achieved by 57% of index grafts. Thirty-eight percent had more than 5 diopters (D) of astigmatism in the graft. Approximately 75% of patients reported satisfaction with their graft (satisfaction being associated with better acuity in the grafted eye than the other eye), graft clarity, and a perceived improvement in lifestyle. Dissatisfaction appeared to be associated with graft failure and problems with contact lens wear. The findings have implications for patient selection for corneal transplantation and for the measurement of outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2062497     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32238-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  16 in total

1.  Visual function after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a prospective longitudinal evaluation.

Authors:  A Brahma; F Ennis; R Harper; A Ridgway; A Tullo
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  [Satisfaction with penetrating keratoplasty. Results of a questionnaire census].

Authors:  D Böhringer; A Schindler; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Surgical alternatives to penetrating keratoplasty II: endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kenneth M Goins
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Outcome of corneal transplantation: can a prioritisation system predict outcome?

Authors:  Patrick P R Saunders; Lyn M Sibley; John S F Richards; Simon P Holland; Debbie L Chow; Paul Courtright
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register.

Authors:  M Claesson; W J Armitage; P Fagerholm; U Stenevi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Strategies for the management of microbial keratitis.

Authors:  B D Allan; J K Dart
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Penetrating keratoplasty in Africa: graft survival and visual outcome.

Authors:  D Yorston; M Wood; A Foster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Are our cornea waiting lists dynamic enough?

Authors:  Melis Palamar; Sait Egrilmez; Ayse Yagci
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Vision-related quality of life in corneal graft recipients.

Authors:  S T Mak; A C-m Wong
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Beveled femtosecond laser astigmatic keratotomy for the treatment of high astigmatism post-penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Catherine Cleary; Maolong Tang; Habeeb Ahmed; Martin Fox; David Huang
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.