Literature DB >> 20624176

Mitochondrial-nuclear epistasis affects fitness within species but does not contribute to fixed incompatibilities between species of Drosophila.

Kristi L Montooth1, Colin D Meiklejohn, Dawn N Abt, David M Rand.   

Abstract

Efficient mitochondrial function requires physical interactions between the proteins encoded by the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Coevolution between these genomes may result in the accumulation of incompatibilities between divergent lineages. We test whether mitochondrial-nuclear incompatibilities have accumulated within the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup by combining divergent mitochondrial and nuclear lineages and quantifying the effects on relative fitness. Precise placement of nine mtDNAs from D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. mauritiana into two D. melanogaster nuclear genetic backgrounds reveals significant mitochondrial-nuclear epistasis affecting fitness in females. Combining the mitochondrial genomes with three different D. melanogaster X chromosomes reveals significant epistasis for male fitness between X-linked and mitochondrial variation. However, we find no evidence that the more than 500 fixed differences between the mitochondrial genomes of D. melanogaster and the D. simulans species complex are incompatible with the D. melanogaster nuclear genome. Rather, the interactions of largest effect occur between mitochondrial and nuclear polymorphisms that segregate within species of the D. melanogaster species subgroup. We propose that a low mitochondrial substitution rate, resulting from a low mutation rate and/or efficient purifying selection, precludes the accumulation of mitochondrial-nuclear incompatibilities among these Drosophila species.
© 2010 The Author(s). Evolution© 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20624176      PMCID: PMC2997886          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01077.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  65 in total

1.  Sexually antagonistic cytonuclear fitness interactions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D M Rand; A G Clark; L M Kann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Cytonuclear coadaptation in Drosophila: disruption of cytochrome c oxidase activity in backcross genotypes.

Authors:  Timothy B Sackton; Robert A Haney; David M Rand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Genetic analysis of speciation by means of introgression into Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Sawamura; A W Davis; C I Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals.

Authors:  Eric Bazin; Sylvain Glémin; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Lee; Jui-Yu Chou; Liplee Cheong; Nai-Hsin Chang; Shi-Yow Yang; Jun-Yi Leu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: polymorphism and levels of cytoplasmic incompatibility.

Authors:  Hervé Merçot; Sylvain Charlat
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Cytonuclear genic incompatibilities cause increased mortality in male F2 hybrids of Nasonia giraulti and N. vitripennis.

Authors:  Oliver Niehuis; Andrea K Judson; Jürgen Gadau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The spectrum of mitochondrial mutation differs across species.

Authors:  Kristi L Montooth; David M Rand
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  54 in total

1.  Preparation of Mitochondrial Enriched Fractions for Metabolic Analysis in Drosophila.

Authors:  Eugenia Villa-Cuesta; David M Rand
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Mito-nuclear interactions modify Drosophila exercise performance.

Authors:  Alyson Sujkowski; Adam N Spierer; Thiviya Rajagopalan; Brian Bazzell; Maryam Safdar; Dinko Imsirovic; Robert Arking; David M Rand; Robert Wessells
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.160

3.  Sex and Mitonuclear Adaptation in Experimental Caenorhabditis elegans Populations.

Authors:  Riana I Wernick; Stephen F Christy; Dana K Howe; Jennifer A Sullins; Joseph F Ramirez; Maura Sare; McKenna J Penley; Levi T Morran; Dee R Denver; Suzanne Estes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The effects of mitochondrial genotype on hypoxic survival and gene expression in a hybrid population of the killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus.

Authors:  Patrick A Flight; Diane Nacci; Denise Champlin; Andrew Whitehead; David M Rand
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Explaining Darwin's corollary to Haldane's rule: the role of mitonuclear interactions in asymmetric postzygotic isolation among toads.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Gregory B Pauly; Michael R May; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A mitochondrial DNA hypomorph of cytochrome oxidase specifically impairs male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Maulik R Patel; Ganesh K Miriyala; Aimee J Littleton; Heiko Yang; Kien Trinh; Janet M Young; Scott R Kennedy; Yukiko M Yamashita; Leo J Pallanck; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Rapamycin increases mitochondrial efficiency by mtDNA-dependent reprogramming of mitochondrial metabolism in Drosophila.

Authors:  Eugenia Villa-Cuesta; Marissa A Holmbeck; David M Rand
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Maternal loading of a small heat shock protein increases embryo thermal tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brent L Lockwood; Cole R Julick; Kristi L Montooth
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Reciprocal cybrids reveal how organellar genomes affect plant phenotypes.

Authors:  Pádraic J Flood; Tom P J M Theeuwen; Korbinian Schneeberger; Paul Keizer; Willem Kruijer; Edouard Severing; Evangelos Kouklas; Jos A Hageman; Raúl Wijfjes; Vanesa Calvo-Baltanas; Frank F M Becker; Sabine K Schnabel; Leo A J Willems; Wilco Ligterink; Jeroen van Arkel; Roland Mumm; José M Gualberto; Linda Savage; David M Kramer; Joost J B Keurentjes; Fred van Eeuwijk; Maarten Koornneef; Jeremy Harbinson; Mark G M Aarts; Erik Wijnker
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 15.793

10.  Natural variation of the Y chromosome suppresses sex ratio distortion and modulates testis-specific gene expression in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  A T Branco; Y Tao; D L Hartl; B Lemos
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.