Literature DB >> 11560895

Sexually antagonistic cytonuclear fitness interactions in Drosophila melanogaster.

D M Rand1, A G Clark, L M Kann.   

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical studies have shown that selection cannot maintain a joint nuclear-cytoplasmic polymorphism within a population except under restrictive conditions of frequency-dependent or sex-specific selection. These conclusions are based on fitness interactions between a diploid autosomal locus and a haploid cytoplasmic locus. We develop a model of joint transmission of X chromosomes and cytoplasms and through simulation show that nuclear-cytoplasmic polymorphisms can be maintained by selection on X-cytoplasm interactions. We test aspects of the model with a "diallel" experiment analyzing fitness interactions between pairwise combinations of X chromosomes and cytoplasms from wild strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Contrary to earlier autosomal studies, significant fitness interactions between X chromosomes and cytoplasms are detected among strains from within populations. The experiment further demonstrates significant sex-by-genotype interactions for mtDNA haplotype, cytoplasms, and X chromosomes. These interactions are sexually antagonistic--i.e., the "good" cytoplasms in females are "bad" in males--analogous to crossing reaction norms. The presence or absence of Wolbachia did not alter the significance of the fitness effects involving X chromosomes and cytoplasms but tended to reduce the significance of mtDNA fitness effects. The negative fitness correlations between the sexes demonstrated in our empirical study are consistent with the conditions that maintain cytoplasmic polymorphism in simulations. Our results suggest that fitness interactions with the sex chromosomes may account for some proportion of cytoplasmic variation in natural populations. Sexually antagonistic selection or reciprocally matched fitness effects of nuclear-cytoplasmic genotypes may be important components of cytonuclear fitness variation and have implications for mitochondrial disease phenotypes that differ between the sexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11560895      PMCID: PMC1461777     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  35 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial evolution.

Authors:  M W Gray; G Burger; B F Lang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Human mtDNA haplogroups associated with high or reduced spermatozoa motility.

Authors:  E Ruiz-Pesini; A C Lapeña; C Díez-Sánchez; A Pérez-Martos; J Montoya; E Alvarez; M Díaz; A Urriés; L Montoro; M J López-Pérez; J A Enríquez
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  The effects of admixture and population subdivision on cytonuclear disequilibria.

Authors:  M A Asmussen; J Arnold
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  D J Begun; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Dynamics of cytonuclear disequilibria in subdivided populations.

Authors:  S Datta; J Arnold
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1998-05-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Effects of differential selection in the sexes on cytonuclear polymorphism and disequilibria.

Authors:  C S Babcock; M A Asmussen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evidence for non-neutrality of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  A F MacRae; W W Anderson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic variation in rates of nondisjunction: association of two naturally occurring polymorphisms in the chromokinesin nod with increased rates of nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M E Zwick; J L Salstrom; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Neutral and non-neutral evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  D M Rand; M Dorfsman; L M Kann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Natural selection with nuclear and cytoplasmic transmission. II. Tests with Drosophila from diverse populations.

Authors:  A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  70 in total

1.  Superior sperm competitors sire higher-quality young.

Authors:  D J Hosken; T W J Garner; T Tregenza; N Wedell; P I Ward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mitochondrial genotype affects fitness in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Avis C James; J William O Ballard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Differential fitness of mitochondrial DNA in perturbation cage studies correlates with global abundance and population history in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  J William O Ballard; Avis C James
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetic architecture underlying host choice differentiation in the sympatric host races of Lochmaea capreae leaf beetles.

Authors:  Shaghayegh Soudi; Klaus Reinhold; Leif Engqvist
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Deleterious epistatic interactions between electron transport system protein-coding loci in the copepod Tigriopus californicus.

Authors:  Christopher S Willett
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Intergenomic epistasis for fitness: within-population interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Damian K Dowling; Urban Friberg; Frank Hailer; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Cytonuclear dynamics in selfing populations under selection.

Authors:  Renyi Liu; Marjorie A Asmussen
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Two-locus epistasis with sexually antagonistic selection: a genetic Parrondo's paradox.

Authors:  Floyd A Reed
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Constraints on the coevolution of contemporary human males and females.

Authors:  Stephen C Stearns; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Douglas Ewbank; Sean G Byars
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.