Literature DB >> 31932677

Reciprocal cybrids reveal how organellar genomes affect plant phenotypes.

Pádraic J Flood1,2,3, Tom P J M Theeuwen4, Korbinian Schneeberger5, Paul Keizer6, Willem Kruijer6, Edouard Severing5, Evangelos Kouklas7, Jos A Hageman6, Raúl Wijfjes8, Vanesa Calvo-Baltanas7, Frank F M Becker7, Sabine K Schnabel6, Leo A J Willems9, Wilco Ligterink9, Jeroen van Arkel10, Roland Mumm10, José M Gualberto11, Linda Savage12, David M Kramer12, Joost J B Keurentjes7, Fred van Eeuwijk6, Maarten Koornneef7,5, Jeremy Harbinson13, Mark G M Aarts7, Erik Wijnker14.   

Abstract

Assessment of the impact of variation in chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA (collectively termed the plasmotype) on plant phenotypes is challenging due to the difficulty in separating their effect from nuclear-derived variation (the nucleotype). Haploid-inducer lines can be used as efficient plasmotype donors to generate new plasmotype-nucleotype combinations (cybrids)1. We generated a panel comprising all possible cybrids of seven Arabidopsis thaliana accessions and extensively phenotyped these lines for 1,859 phenotypes under both stable and fluctuating conditions. We show that natural variation in the plasmotype results in both additive and epistatic effects across all phenotypic categories. Plasmotypes that induce more additive phenotypic changes also cause more epistatic effects, suggesting a possible common basis for both additive and epistatic effects. On average, epistatic interactions explained twice as much of the variance in phenotypes as additive plasmotype effects. The impact of plasmotypic variation was also more pronounced under fluctuating and stressful environmental conditions. Thus, the phenotypic impact of variation in plasmotypes is the outcome of multi-level nucleotype-plasmotype-environment interactions and, as such, the plasmotype is likely to serve as a reservoir of variation that is predominantly exposed under certain conditions. The production of cybrids using haploid inducers is a rapid and precise method for assessment of the phenotypic effects of natural variation in organellar genomes. It will facilitate efficient screening of unique nucleotype-plasmotype combinations to both improve our understanding of natural variation in these combinations and identify favourable combinations to enhance plant performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31932677     DOI: 10.1038/s41477-019-0575-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Plants        ISSN: 2055-0278            Impact factor:   15.793


  44 in total

Review 1.  Learning the Languages of the Chloroplast: Retrograde Signaling and Beyond.

Authors:  Kai Xun Chan; Su Yin Phua; Peter Crisp; Ryan McQuinn; Barry J Pogson
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 26.379

2.  Mitochondrial-nuclear epistasis affects fitness within species but does not contribute to fixed incompatibilities between species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Kristi L Montooth; Colin D Meiklejohn; Dawn N Abt; David M Rand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  A meta-analysis of the strength and nature of cytoplasmic genetic effects.

Authors:  R Dobler; B Rogell; F Budar; D K Dowling
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Whole-Genome Hitchhiking on an Organelle Mutation.

Authors:  Pádraic J Flood; Joost van Heerwaarden; Frank Becker; C Bastiaan de Snoo; Jeremy Harbinson; Mark G M Aarts
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Nuclear-mitochondrial epistasis for fitness in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Clifford Zeyl; Bethany Andreson; Emily Weninck
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Hierarchical nuclear and cytoplasmic genetic architectures for plant growth and defense within Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Bindu Joseph; Jason A Corwin; Tobias Züst; Baohua Li; Majid Iravani; Gabriela Schaepman-Strub; Lindsay A Turnbull; Daniel J Kliebenstein
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  A haploid genetics toolbox for Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Maruthachalam Ravi; Mohan Prem Anand Marimuthu; Ek Han Tan; Shamoni Maheshwari; Isabelle M Henry; Brenda Marin-Rodriguez; Guillaume Urtecho; Jie Tan; Kristina Thornhill; Fan Zhu; Aneesh Panoli; Venkatesan Sundaresan; Anne B Britt; Luca Comai; Simon W L Chan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Cytonuclear interactions affect adaptive traits of the annual plant Arabidopsis thaliana in the field.

Authors:  Fabrice Roux; Tristan Mary-Huard; Elise Barillot; Estelle Wenes; Lucy Botran; Stéphanie Durand; Romain Villoutreix; Marie-Laure Martin-Magniette; Christine Camilleri; Françoise Budar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A chloroplast retrograde signal regulates nuclear alternative splicing.

Authors:  Ezequiel Petrillo; Micaela A Godoy Herz; Armin Fuchs; Dominik Reifer; John Fuller; Marcelo J Yanovsky; Craig Simpson; John W S Brown; Andrea Barta; Maria Kalyna; Alberto R Kornblihtt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Cytoplasmic genetic variation and extensive cytonuclear interactions influence natural variation in the metabolome.

Authors:  Bindu Joseph; Jason A Corwin; Baohua Li; Suzi Atwell; Daniel J Kliebenstein
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Consequences of a Disruption in Cyto-Nuclear Coadaptation on the Molecular Response to a Nitrate Starvation in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Fabien Chardon; Gwendal Cueff; Etienne Delannoy; Fabien Aubé; Aurélia Lornac; Magali Bedu; Françoise Gilard; Stéphanie Pateyron; Hélène Rogniaux; Audrey Gargaros; Hakim Mireau; Loïc Rajjou; Marie-Laure Martin-Magniette; Françoise Budar
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 2.  The Role of Transcriptional Regulation in Hybrid Vigor.

Authors:  Ramon Botet; Joost J B Keurentjes
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Light potentials of photosynthetic energy storage in the field: what limits the ability to use or dissipate rapidly increased light energy?

Authors:  Atsuko Kanazawa; Abhijnan Chattopadhyay; Sebastian Kuhlgert; Hainite Tuitupou; Tapabrata Maiti; David M Kramer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Genetics as a key to improving crop photosynthesis.

Authors:  Tom P J M Theeuwen; Louise L Logie; Jeremy Harbinson; Mark G M Aarts
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 7.298

Review 5.  Cytonuclear Genetic Incompatibilities in Plant Speciation.

Authors:  Zoé Postel; Pascal Touzet
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-10

6.  The Investigation of Perennial Sunflower Species (Helianthus L.) Mitochondrial Genomes.

Authors:  Maksim Makarenko; Alexander Usatov; Tatiana Tatarinova; Kirill Azarin; Alexey Kovalevich; Vera Gavrilova; Renate Horn
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Parent-of-Origin Effects on Seed Size Modify Heterosis Responses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Rosa Castillo-Bravo; Antoine Fort; Ronan Cashell; Galina Brychkova; Peter C McKeown; Charles Spillane
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.753

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.