Literature DB >> 20623512

Participation in an ambulatory e-pharmacovigilance system.

Jennifer S Haas1, Aarthi Iyer, E John Orav, Gordon D Schiff, David W Bates.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is growing concern about whether passive surveillance can detect adverse drug events (ADEs). Our objective was to demonstrate the reach of an interactive voice response system (IVRS) to systematically monitor symptoms experienced by ambulatory patients prescribed one of 31 medications, and to document whether there were differences in our ability to contact certain populations.
METHODS: Patients receiving a prescription for a target medication at one of 11 clinics were eligible for a cross-sectional IVRS survey, "e-pharmacovigilance," with a follow-up survey done 3 months later if the target medication was still listed on the patient's active medication list.
RESULTS: 902 patients participated, representing 43.3% of contacted and 25.7% of potentially eligible patients with a working phone. After adjustment for demographics and drug class, patients >66 years were more likely to participate than those 56-65 years (odds ratio 1.47; 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.81). Hispanics were less likely than whites (0.56; 0.42-0.76), and those in low-income communities less likely to participate than those in high-income communities (0.69; 0.58-0.82). Patients prescribed asthma, or seizure medications were more likely to participate than those prescribed medications for insomnia. Of patients reached by the system, those prescribed medications were erectile dysfunction and smoking cessation were less likely, and those prescribed seizure medication were more likely to participate.
CONCLUSIONS: IVRS technology can be used to perform ambulatory e-pharmacovigilance for a broad spectrum of patients, particularly older individuals who may at particular risk for ADEs. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20623512     DOI: 10.1002/pds.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  17 in total

1.  Bridging the gap between research and practice: an assessment of external validity of community-based physical activity programs in Bogotá, Colombia, and Recife, Brazil.

Authors:  Diana C Paez; Rodrigo S Reis; Diana C Parra; Christine M Hoehner; Olga L Sarmiento; Mauro Barros; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Screening for Adverse Drug Events: a Randomized Trial of Automated Calls Coupled with Phone-Based Pharmacist Counseling.

Authors:  Gordon D Schiff; Elissa Klinger; Alejandra Salazar; Jeffrey Medoff; Mary G Amato; E John Orav; Shimon Shaykevich; Enrique V Seoane; Lake Walsh; Theresa E Fuller; Patricia C Dykes; David W Bates; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Electronic Health Record Interactions through Voice: A Review.

Authors:  Yaa A Kumah-Crystal; Claude J Pirtle; Harrison M Whyte; Edward S Goode; Shilo H Anders; Christoph U Lehmann
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 4.  The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time.

Authors:  Bridget Gaglio; Jo Ann Shoup; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Exploration of an automated approach for receiving patient feedback after outpatient acute care visits.

Authors:  Eta S Berner; Midge N Ray; Anantachai Panjamapirom; Richard S Maisiak; James H Willig; Thomas M English; Marc Krawitz; Christa R Nevin; Shannon Houser; Mark P Cohen; Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Do package inserts reflect symptoms experienced in practice?: assessment using an automated phone pharmacovigilance system with varenicline and zolpidem in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Mary Amato; Lucas Marinacci; E John Orav; Gordon D Schiff; David W Bates
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Overview of the First Natural Language Processing Challenge for Extracting Medication, Indication, and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Record Notes (MADE 1.0).

Authors:  Abhyuday Jagannatha; Feifan Liu; Weisong Liu; Hong Yu
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Closing the feedback loop: an interactive voice response system to provide follow-up and feedback in primary care settings.

Authors:  James H Willig; Marc Krawitz; Anantachai Panjamapirom; Midge N Ray; Christa R Nevin; Thomas M English; Mark P Cohen; Eta S Berner
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  The E-Coach technology-assisted care transition system: a pragmatic randomized trial.

Authors:  Christine S Ritchie; Thomas K Houston; Joshua S Richman; Heather J Sobko; Eta S Berner; Benjamin B Taylor; Amanda H Salanitro; Julie L Locher
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Telephone follow-up in primary care: can interactive voice response calls work?

Authors:  Shannon H Houser; Midge N Ray; Richard Maisiak; Anantachai Panjamapirom; James Willing; Gordon D Schiff; Thomas English; Christa Nevin; Eta S Berner
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.