Literature DB >> 30291602

Screening for Adverse Drug Events: a Randomized Trial of Automated Calls Coupled with Phone-Based Pharmacist Counseling.

Gordon D Schiff1,2, Elissa Klinger3,4, Alejandra Salazar3, Jeffrey Medoff3, Mary G Amato5, E John Orav3,6, Shimon Shaykevich3, Enrique V Seoane7, Lake Walsh3, Theresa E Fuller3,8, Patricia C Dykes3,6, David W Bates3,6, Jennifer S Haas3,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication adverse events are important and common yet are often not identified by clinicians. We evaluated an automated telephone surveillance system coupled with transfer to a live pharmacist to screen potentially drug-related symptoms after newly starting medications for four common primary care conditions: hypertension, diabetes, depression, and insomnia.
METHODS: Cluster randomized trial with automated calls to eligible patients at 1 and 4 months after starting target drugs from intervention primary care clinics compared to propensity-matched patients from control clinics. Primary and secondary outcomes were physician documentation of any adverse effects associated with newly prescribed target medication, and whether the medication was discontinued and, if yes, whether the reason for stopping was an adverse effect.
RESULTS: Of 4876 eligible intervention clinic patients who were contacted using automated calls, 776 (15.1%) responded and participated in the automated call. Based on positive symptom responses or request to speak to a pharmacist, 320 patients were transferred to the pharmacist and discussed 1021 potentially drug-related symptoms. Of these, 188 (18.5%) were assessed as probably and 479 (47.1%) as possibly related to the medication. Compared to a propensity-matched cohort of control clinic patients, intervention patients were significantly more likely to have adverse effects documented in the medical record by a physician (277 vs. 164 adverse effects, p < 0.0001, and 177 vs. 122 patients discontinued with documented adverse effects, p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Systematic automated telephone outreach monitoring coupled with real-time phone referral to a pharmacist identified a substantial number of previously unidentified potentially drug-related symptoms, many of which were validated as probably or possibly related to the drug by the pharmacist or their physicians. Multiple challenges were encountered using the interactive voice response (IVR) automated calling system, suggesting that other approaches may need to be considered and evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02087293.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30291602      PMCID: PMC6374268          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4672-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  24 in total

1.  Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans.

Authors:  Daniel S Budnitz; Maribeth C Lovegrove; Nadine Shehab; Chesley L Richards
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cost implications of human and automated follow-up in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Eta S Berner; Jeffrey H Burkhardt; Anantachai Panjamapirom; Midge N Ray
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Adverse drug events in the outpatient setting: an 11-year national analysis.

Authors:  Florence T Bourgeois; Michael W Shannon; Clarissa Valim; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  US Emergency Department Visits for Outpatient Adverse Drug Events, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Nadine Shehab; Maribeth C Lovegrove; Andrew I Geller; Kathleen O Rose; Nina J Weidle; Daniel S Budnitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Exploration of an automated approach for receiving patient feedback after outpatient acute care visits.

Authors:  Eta S Berner; Midge N Ray; Anantachai Panjamapirom; Richard S Maisiak; James H Willig; Thomas M English; Marc Krawitz; Christa R Nevin; Shannon Houser; Mark P Cohen; Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Prevalence of adverse drug events in ambulatory care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie V Taché; Andreas Sönnichsen; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Usability of a computerised drug monitoring programme to detect adverse drug events and non-compliance in outpatient ambulatory care.

Authors:  Claudine Auger; Alan J Forster; Natalie Oake; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Telephone follow-up in primary care: can interactive voice response calls work?

Authors:  Shannon H Houser; Midge N Ray; Richard Maisiak; Anantachai Panjamapirom; James Willing; Gordon D Schiff; Thomas English; Christa Nevin; Eta S Berner
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2013

9.  Medication use leading to emergency department visits for adverse drug events in older adults.

Authors:  Daniel S Budnitz; Nadine Shehab; Scott R Kegler; Chesley L Richards
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX.

Authors:  Maged N Kamel Boulos; Steve Wheeler; Carlos Tavares; Ray Jones
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Intelligent Telehealth in Pharmacovigilance: A Future Perspective.

Authors:  Heba Edrees; Wenyu Song; Ania Syrowatka; Aurélien Simona; Mary G Amato; David W Bates
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 5.228

Review 2.  Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Van C Willis; Kelly Jean Thomas Craig; Yalda Jabbarpour; Elisabeth L Scheufele; Yull E Arriaga; Monica Ajinkya; Kyu B Rhee; Andrew Bazemore
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-01-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.