Literature DB >> 20622982

Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks.

Carol A Fowler1, Julie M Brown, Laura Sabadini, Jeffrey Weihing.   

Abstract

Participants took part in two speech tests. In both tests, a model speaker produced vowel-consonant-vowels (VCVs) in which the initial vowel varied unpredictably in duration. In the simple response task, participants shadowed the initial vowel; when the model shifted to production of any of three CVs (/pa/, /ta/ or /ka/), participants produced a CV that they were assigned to say (one of /pa/, /ta/ or /ka/). In the choice task, participants shadowed the initial vowel; when the model shifted to a CV, participants shadowed that too. We found that, measured from the model's onset of closure for the consonant to the participant's closure onset, response times in the choice task exceeded those in the simple task by just 26 ms. This is much shorter than the canonical difference between simple and choice latencies [100-150 ms according to Luce (1986)] and is near the fastest simple times that Luce reports. The findings imply rapid access to articulatory speech information in the choice task. A second experiment found much longer choice times when the perception-production link for speech could not be exploited. A third experiment and an acoustic analysis verified that our measurement from closure in Experiment 1 provided a valid marker of speakers' onsets of consonant production. A final experiment showed that shadowing responses are imitations of the model's speech. We interpret the findings as evidence that listeners rapidly extract information about speakers' articulatory gestures.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 20622982      PMCID: PMC2901126          DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00072-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  23 in total

Review 1.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements.

Authors:  F H Guenther; M Hampson; D Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

7.  Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.

Authors:  J R Simon; J V Hinrichs; J L Craft
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-10

8.  Auditory coding, cues, and coherence in phonetic perception.

Authors:  J R Sawusch; D A Gagnon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects.

Authors:  J G Martin; H T Bunnell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10
View more
  27 in total

1.  Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Martina Huss; Ferath Kherif; Fermin Moscoso del Prado Martin; Olaf Hauk; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

3.  Dental-to-velar perceptual assimilation: a cross-linguistic study of the perception of dental stop+/l/ clusters.

Authors:  Pierre A Hallé; Catherine T Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring.

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  The motor theory of speech perception revisited.

Authors:  Dominic W Massaro; Trevor H Chen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

6.  Cortical activity patterns predict speech discrimination ability.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Claudia A Perez; YeTing H Chen; Ryan S Carraway; Amanda C Reed; Jai A Shetake; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Syncing Up for a Good Conversation: A Clinically Meaningful Methodology for Capturing Conversational Entrainment in the Speech Domain.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Megan M Willi; Visar Berisha
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Learning to speak by listening: Transfer of phonotactics from perception to production.

Authors:  Audrey K Kittredge; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Does experience in talking facilitate speech repetition?

Authors:  Linda I Shuster; Donna R Moore; Gang Chen; Dennis M Ruscello; William F Wonderlin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.