Literature DB >> 20620703

Feasibility of dual Doppler velocity measurements to estimate volume pulsations of an arterial segment.

Craig J Hartley1, Anilkumar K Reddy, Sridhar Madala, Mark L Entman, George E Taffet.   

Abstract

If volume flow was measured at each end of an arterial segment with no branches, any instantaneous differences would indicate that volume was increasing or decreasing transiently within the segment. This concept could provide an alternative method to assess the mechanical properties or distensibility of an artery noninvasively using ultrasound. The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of using Doppler measurements of pulsatile velocity (opposed to flow) at two sites to estimate the volume pulsations of the intervening arterial segment. To test the concept over a wide range of dimensions, we made simultaneous measurements of velocity in a short 5 mm segment of a mouse common carotid artery and in a longer 20 cm segment of a human brachial-radial artery using a two-channel 20 MHz pulsed Doppler and calculated the waveforms and magnitudes of the volume pulsations during the cardiac cycle. We also estimated pulse wave velocity from the velocity upstroke arrival times and measured artery wall motion using tissue Doppler methods for comparison of magnitudes and waveforms. Volume pulsations estimated from Doppler velocity measurements were 16% for the mouse carotid artery and 4% for the human brachial artery. These values are consistent with the measured pulse wave velocities of 4.2 m/s and 10 m/s, respectively, and with the mouse carotid diameter pulsation. In addition, the segmental volume waveforms resemble diameter and pressure waveforms as expected. We conclude that with proper application and further validation, dual Doppler velocity measurements can be used to estimate the magnitude and waveform of volume pulsations of an arterial segment and to provide an alternative noninvasive index of arterial mechanical properties. Copyright 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20620703      PMCID: PMC2904320          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  37 in total

1.  Elasticity imaging of atheroma with transcutaneous ultrasound: preliminary study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kanai; Hideyuki Hasegawa; Masataka Ichiki; Fumiaki Tezuka; Yoshiro Koiwa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Doppler evaluation of peripheral vascular adaptations to transverse aortic banding in mice.

Authors:  Yi-Heng Li; Anilkumar K Reddy; George E Taffet; Lloyd H Michael; Mark L Entman; Craig J Hartley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Simultaneous assessment of diameter and pressure waveforms in the carotid artery.

Authors:  Jan M Meinders; Arnold P G Hoeks
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  A phase-locked echo tracking system for recording arterial diameter changes in vivo.

Authors:  D E Hokanson; D J Mozersky; D S Sumner; D E Strandness
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Dispersion and attenuation of small artificial pressure waves in the canine aorta.

Authors:  M Anliker; M B Histand; E Ogden
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Hemodynamic effects of unloading the old heart.

Authors:  A Nussbacher; G Gerstenblith; F C O'Connor; L C Becker; D A Kass; S P Schulman; J L Fleg; E G Lakatta
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-11

7.  Noninvasive determination of pulse-wave velocity in mice.

Authors:  C J Hartley; G E Taffet; L H Michael; T T Pham; M L Entman
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-07

8.  Arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and the risk of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Thomas Weber; Johann Auer; Michael F O'Rourke; Erich Kvas; Elisabeth Lassnig; Robert Berent; Bernd Eber
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-12-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Noninvasive cardiovascular phenotyping in mice.

Authors:  Craig J Hartley; George E Taffet; Anilkumar K Reddy; Mark L Entman; Lloyd H Michael
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2002

10.  Noninvasive ultrasonic measurement of arterial wall motion in mice.

Authors:  Craig J Hartley; Anilkumar K Reddy; Sridhar Madala; Mark L Entman; Lloyd H Michael; George E Taffet
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.733

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Is Vasomotion in Cerebral Arteries Impaired in Alzheimer's Disease?

Authors:  Luigi Yuri Di Marco; Eszter Farkas; Chris Martin; Annalena Venneri; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.472

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.