Literature DB >> 20620164

Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research.

Annaliese K Beery1, Irving Zucker.   

Abstract

Female mammals have long been neglected in biomedical research. The NIH mandated enrollment of women in human clinical trials in 1993, but no similar initiatives exist to foster research on female animals. We reviewed sex bias in research on mammals in 10 biological fields for 2009 and their historical precedents. Male bias was evident in 8 disciplines and most prominent in neuroscience, with single-sex studies of male animals outnumbering those of females 5.5 to 1. In the past half-century, male bias in non-human studies has increased while declining in human studies. Studies of both sexes frequently fail to analyze results by sex. Underrepresentation of females in animal models of disease is also commonplace, and our understanding of female biology is compromised by these deficiencies. The majority of articles in several journals are conducted on rats and mice to the exclusion of other useful animal models. The belief that non-human female mammals are intrinsically more variable than males and too troublesome for routine inclusion in research protocols is without foundation. We recommend that when only one sex is studied, this should be indicated in article titles, and that funding agencies favor proposals that investigate both sexes and analyze data by sex.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20620164      PMCID: PMC3008499          DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  52 in total

1.  Sex bias blights drug studies.

Authors:  Erika Check Hayden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Animal models for human sexuality.

Authors:  F A Beach
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1978 Mar 14-16

Review 3.  Strategies and methods for research on sex differences in brain and behavior.

Authors:  Jill B Becker; Arthur P Arnold; Karen J Berkley; Jeffrey D Blaustein; Lisa A Eckel; Elizabeth Hampson; James P Herman; Sherry Marts; Wolfgang Sadee; Meir Steiner; Jane Taylor; Elizabeth Young
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 4.  Estrogen and testosterone therapies in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Stefan M Gold; Rhonda R Voskuhl
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Sex differences in coronary heart disease. Why are women so superior? The 1995 Ancel Keys Lecture.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-01-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Adherence to federal guidelines for reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials.

Authors:  Stacie E Geller; Marci Goldstein Adams; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Animal models of anxiety and depression: how are females different?

Authors:  P Palanza
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  Sex hormones in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: implications for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  R R Voskuhl; K Palaszynski
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berger; Laine Elliott; Dianne Gallup; Matthew Roe; Christopher B Granger; Paul W Armstrong; R John Simes; Harvey D White; Frans Van de Werf; Eric J Topol; Judith S Hochman; L Kristin Newby; Robert A Harrington; Robert M Califf; Richard C Becker; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Hypertension in women: what is really known? The Women's Caucus, Working Group on Women's Health of the Society of General Internal Medicine.

Authors:  K Anastos; P Charney; R A Charon; E Cohen; C Y Jones; C Marte; D M Swiderski; M E Wheat; S Williams
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  443 in total

Review 1.  A half-truth is a whole lie: on the necessity of investigating sex influences on the brain.

Authors:  Larry Cahill
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 2.  Understanding the sexome: measuring and reporting sex differences in gene systems.

Authors:  Arthur P Arnold; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 3.  Immune cells have sex and so should journal articles.

Authors:  Sabra L Klein
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  Males still dominate animal studies.

Authors:  Irving Zucker; Annaliese K Beery
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Sex differences in cannabinoid pharmacology: a reflection of differences in the endocannabinoid system?

Authors:  Rebecca M Craft; Julie A Marusich; Jenny L Wiley
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 6.  Genomic and epigenomic mechanisms of glucocorticoids in the brain.

Authors:  Jason D Gray; Joshua F Kogan; Jordan Marrocco; Bruce S McEwen
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses.

Authors:  S K Hunter
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 6.311

8.  Abbreviated environmental enrichment confers neurobehavioral, cognitive, and histological benefits in brain-injured female rats.

Authors:  Hannah L Radabaugh; Lauren J Carlson; Darik A O'Neil; Megan J LaPorte; Christina M Monaco; Jeffrey P Cheng; Patricia B de la Tremblaye; Naima Lajud; Corina O Bondi; Anthony E Kline
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 9.  Psychoactive drug exposure during breastfeeding: a critical need for preclinical behavioral testing.

Authors:  Irving Zucker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Female rats are resistant to the long-lasting neurobehavioral changes induced by adolescent stress exposure.

Authors:  Katharina Klinger; Felipe V Gomes; Millie Rincón-Cortés; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.