Literature DB >> 20620127

Is alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings total hip replacement the right choice in patients younger than 50 years of age? A 7- to 15-year follow-up study.

P Boyer1, D Huten, P Loriaut, V Lestrat, C Jeanrot, P Massin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The alumina-on-alumina bearing couple in total hip replacement seems to be well adapted for young and active patients because of the absence of wear and the rarity of osteolysis. Over the long term, doubts persist as to the cementless cup fixation and on the functioning of this bearing system because of possible acoustic emissions during use. HYPOTHESIS: In young subjects, the ceramic-on-ceramic bearing system limits wear and osteolysis occurrences, without exposing patients to serious side effects. MATERIAL AND MEHTODS: We report the results, with between 7 and 15 years of follow-up, for 32mm-diameter alumina-on-alumina implants in 76 patients younger than 50 years of age (83 hips), combining cementless press-fit hemispheric cups with titanium stems, [either cemented (63 Osteal™ stems) or cementless (20 Multicône™ stems)], with particular attention paid to cup fixation and noise emissions during implant function. First-generation or Cerafit trellis™ acetabular components had a riveted titanium mesh (31 cases), whereas the most recent (Cerafit hydroxyapatite [HA]™) cups had a porous surface coated with hydroxyapatite (52 cases).
RESULTS: Three cases of aseptic loosening of the cemented stems were observed as well as late migration of a Cerafit trellis™ cup in the 12th postoperative year. One ceramic insert broke in the eighth postoperative year. With the exception of one case, the patients, questioned retrospectively, reported no audible noise. With aseptic loosening (revised or not), the criterion for failure, the 12-year survival rate was 91±11% for the Cerafit trellis™ acetabular components and 91±16% for the cemented Osteal™ stems. The 9- and 7-year survival rates for the Cerafit HA™ cups and the Multicône™ stems, respectively, were 100%. Including all revisions for any cause, the 10-year survival rate of the entire series was 92%±11%. DISCUSSION: Despite the absence of wear and osteolysis, the long-term survival of these implants in young subjects should be improved. Although longer follow-up is necessary to formulate a definitive opinion, we tend to prefer cementless stem and cup fixation in ceramic-on-ceramic bearing systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 retrospective study.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20620127     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  9 in total

1.  Dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty five years and over ten years of follow-up : A prospective and comparative series.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Puch; Guy Derhi; Loys Descamps; Régis Verdier; Jacques H Caton
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: a systematic review of the contemporary literature

Authors:  Xin Yu Mei; Ying Jia Gong; Oleg Safir; Allan Gross; Paul Kuzyk
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Meta-analysis of the Incidence and Risk Factors for Squeaking after Primary Ceramic-on-ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Asian Patients.

Authors:  Tae-Hun Lee; Young-Wan Moon; Seung-Jae Lim; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2014-06-30

4.  High failure rate of a new pressfit cup in mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Steffen Brodt; Georg Matziolis; Christoph Windisch; Andreas Gosse; Matthias Spalteholz; Ralf Herbert Gahr
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Henri Migaud; Sophie Putman; Grégory Kern; Ronald Isida; Julien Girard; Nassima Ramdane; Christian P Delaunay; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  William M Mihalko; Markus A Wimmer; Carol A Pacione; Michel P Laurent; Robert F Murphy; Carson Rider
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The damping effect of cement as a potential mitigation factor of squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  F J Burgo; D E Mengelle; A Ozols; C Fernandez; C M Autorino
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 8.  Ten-year survival of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ihab Ibraheam El-Desouky; Albaraa Hassan Helal; Ali Mohamed Reda Mansour
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  Hip Squeaking after Ceramic-on-ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Guo-Liang Wu; Wei Zhu; Yan Zhao; Qi Ma; Xi-Sheng Weng
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.