Literature DB >> 20618961

LTR retroelements in the genome of Daphnia pulex.

Mina Rho1, Sarah Schaack, Xiang Gao, Sun Kim, Michael Lynch, Haixu Tang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long terminal repeat (LTR) retroelements represent a successful group of transposable elements (TEs) that have played an important role in shaping the structure of many eukaryotic genomes. Here, we present a genome-wide analysis of LTR retroelements in Daphnia pulex, a cyclical parthenogen and the first crustacean for which the whole genomic sequence is available. In addition, we analyze transcriptional data and perform transposon display assays of lab-reared lineages and natural isolates to identify potential influences on TE mobility and differences in LTR retroelements loads among individuals reproducing with and without sex.
RESULTS: We conducted a comprehensive de novo search for LTR retroelements and identified 333 intact LTR retroelements representing 142 families in the D. pulex genome. While nearly half of the identified LTR retroelements belong to the gypsy group, we also found copia (95), BEL/Pao (66) and DIRS (19) retroelements. Phylogenetic analysis of reverse transcriptase sequences showed that LTR retroelements in the D. pulex genome form many lineages distinct from known families, suggesting that the majority are novel. Our investigation of transcriptional activity of LTR retroelements using tiling array data obtained from three different experimental conditions found that 71 LTR retroelements are actively transcribed. Transposon display assays of mutation-accumulation lines showed evidence for putative somatic insertions for two DIRS retroelement families. Losses of presumably heterozygous insertions were observed in lineages in which selfing occurred, but never in asexuals, highlighting the potential impact of reproductive mode on TE abundance and distribution over time. The same two families were also assayed across natural isolates (both cyclical parthenogens and obligate asexuals) and there were more retroelements in populations capable of reproducing sexually for one of the two families assayed.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of LTR retroelements activity in the evolution of other genomes, this comprehensive survey provides insight into the potential impact of LTR retroelements on the genome of D. pulex, a cyclically parthenogenetic microcrustacean that has served as an ecological model for over a century.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20618961      PMCID: PMC2996953          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


  41 in total

1.  Transposable elements in sexual and ancient asexual taxa.

Authors:  I Arkhipova; M Meselson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Systematic screening of Anopheles mosquito genomes yields evidence for a major clade of Pao-like retrotransposons.

Authors:  J M Cook; J Martin; A Lewin; R E Sinden; M Tristem
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.585

3.  The fate of transposable elements in asexual populations.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Transposon Display identifies individual transposable elements in high copy number lines.

Authors:  D Van den Broeck; T Maes; M Sauer; J Zethof; P De Keukeleire; M D'hauw; M Van Montagu; T Gerats
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 5.  Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks.

Authors:  Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Unexpected consequences of a sudden and massive transposon amplification on rice gene expression.

Authors:  Ken Naito; Feng Zhang; Takuji Tsukiyama; Hiroki Saito; C Nathan Hancock; Aaron O Richardson; Yutaka Okumoto; Takatoshi Tanisaka; Susan R Wessler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Survey of long terminal repeat retrotransposons of domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori).

Authors:  Xu Jin-Shan; Xia Qing-You; Li Jun; Pan Guo-Qing; Zhou Ze-Yang
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.714

8.  A genome-wide screening of BEL-Pao like retrotransposons in Anopheles gambiae by the LTR_STRUC program.

Authors:  Renè Massimiliano Marsano; Ruggiero Caizzi
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  DIRS retroelements in arthropods: identification of the recently active TcDirs1 element in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  T J D Goodwin; R T M Poulter; M D Lorenzen; R W Beeman
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 3.291

10.  Long terminal repeat retrotransposons of Oryza sativa.

Authors:  Eugene M McCarthy; Jingdong Liu; Gao Lizhi; John F McDonald
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Eukaryote DIRS1-like retrotransposons: an overview.

Authors:  Mathieu Piednoël; Isabelle R Gonçalves; Dominique Higuet; Eric Bonnivard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Insertion Polymorphisms of Mobile Genetic Elements in Sexual and Asexual Populations of Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Jiang; Haixu Tang; Zhiqiang Ye; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.416

3.  A Survey of Transposon Landscapes in the Putative Ancient Asexual Ostracod Darwinula stevensoni.

Authors:  Isa Schön; Fernando Rodriguez; Matthew Dunn; Koen Martens; Michael Shribak; Irina R Arkhipova
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Mobile element scanning (ME-Scan) identifies thousands of novel Alu insertions in diverse human populations.

Authors:  David J Witherspoon; Yuhua Zhang; Jinchuan Xing; W Scott Watkins; Hongseok Ha; Mark A Batzer; Lynn B Jorde
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  LTRsift: a graphical user interface for semi-automatic classification and postprocessing of de novo detected LTR retrotransposons.

Authors:  Sascha Steinbiss; Sascha Kastens; Stefan Kurtz
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2012-11-07

6.  LTR-retrotransposons in R. exoculata and other crustaceans: the outstanding success of GalEa-like copia elements.

Authors:  Mathieu Piednoël; Tifenn Donnart; Caroline Esnault; Paula Graça; Dominique Higuet; Eric Bonnivard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Large-scale transcriptome analysis of retroelements in the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria.

Authors:  Feng Jiang; Meiling Yang; Wei Guo; Xianhui Wang; Le Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  LTR retroelements are intrinsic components of transcriptional networks in frogs.

Authors:  José Horacio Grau; Albert J Poustka; Martin Meixner; Jörg Plötner
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  No Accumulation of Transposable Elements in Asexual Arthropods.

Authors:  Jens Bast; Ina Schaefer; Tanja Schwander; Mark Maraun; Stefan Scheu; Ken Kraaijeveld
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Reverse transcriptase genes are highly abundant and transcriptionally active in marine plankton assemblages.

Authors:  Magali Lescot; Pascal Hingamp; Kenji K Kojima; Emilie Villar; Sarah Romac; Alaguraj Veluchamy; Martine Boccara; Olivier Jaillon; Daniele Iudicone; Chris Bowler; Patrick Wincker; Jean-Michel Claverie; Hiroyuki Ogata
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 10.302

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.