Literature DB >> 20618311

Estimating subject-specific dependent competing risk profile with censored event time observations.

Yi Li1, Lu Tian, Lee-Jen Wei.   

Abstract

In a longitudinal study, suppose that the primary endpoint is the time to a specific event. This response variable, however, may be censored by an independent censoring variable or by the occurrence of one of several dependent competing events. For each study subject, a set of baseline covariates is collected. The question is how to construct a reliable prediction rule for the future subject's profile of all competing risks of interest at a specific time point for risk-benefit decision making. In this article, we propose a two-stage procedure to make inferences about such subject-specific profiles. For the first step, we use a parametric model to obtain a univariate risk index score system. We then estimate consistently the average competing risks for subjects who have the same parametric index score via a nonparametric function estimation procedure. We illustrate this new proposal with the data from a randomized clinical trial for evaluating the efficacy of a treatment for prostate cancer. The primary endpoint for this study was the time to prostate cancer death, but had two types of dependent competing events, one from cardiovascular death and the other from death of other causes.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20618311      PMCID: PMC2970653          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01456.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  Competing risks as a multi-state model.

Authors:  Per Kragh Andersen; Steen Z Abildstrom; Susanne Rosthøj
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Regression modeling of competing risks data based on pseudovalues of the cumulative incidence function.

Authors:  John P Klein; Per Kragh Andersen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Applications of crude incidence curves.

Authors:  E L Korn; F J Dorey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Modelling competing risks in cancer studies.

Authors:  John P Klein
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Prediction of cumulative incidence function under the proportional hazards model.

Authors:  S C Cheng; J P Fine; L J Wei
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Calibrating parametric subject-specific risk estimation.

Authors:  T Cai; L Tian; Hajime Uno; Scott D Solomon; L J Wei
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  Improved methodology for analyzing local and distant recurrence.

Authors:  R Gelman; R Gelber; I C Henderson; C N Coleman; J R Harris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prospective accuracy for longitudinal markers.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Effect of systemic adjuvant treatment on first sites of breast cancer relapse.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; K N Price; M Castiglione; A S Coates; C M Rudenstam; J Collins; J Lindtner; A Hacking; G Marini
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-02-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Semi-supervised methods to predict patient survival from gene expression data.

Authors:  Eric Bair; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-04-13       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  3 in total

1.  Treatment selections using risk-benefit profiles based on data from comparative randomized clinical trials with multiple endpoints.

Authors:  Brian Claggett; Lu Tian; Davide Castagno; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A threshold-free summary index of prediction accuracy for censored time to event data.

Authors:  Yan Yuan; Qian M Zhou; Bingying Li; Hengrui Cai; Eric J Chow; Gregory T Armstrong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Automated primary care screening in pediatric waiting rooms.

Authors:  Vibha Anand; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 7.124

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.