Literature DB >> 20618222

Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve.

Francesca Viscardi1, Christian Vergara, Luca Antiga, Sabrina Merelli, Alessandro Veneziani, Giovanni Puppini, Giuseppe Faggian, Alessandro Mazzucco, Giovanni Battista Luciani.   

Abstract

In bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease, the role of genetic and hemodynamic factors influencing ascending aortic pathology is controversial. To test the effect of BAV geometry on ascending aortic flow, a finite element analysis was undertaken. A surface model of aortic root and ascending aorta was obtained from magnetic resonance images of patients with BAV and tricuspid aortic valve using segmentation facilities of the image processing code Vascular Modeling Toolkit (developed at the Mario Negri Institute). Analytical models of bicuspid (antero-posterior [AP], type 1 and latero-lateral, type 2 commissures) and tricuspid orifices were mathematically defined and turned into a volumetric mesh of linear tetrahedra for computational fluid dynamics simulations. Numerical simulations were performed with the finite element code LifeV. Flow velocity fields were assessed for four levels: aortic annulus, sinus of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, and ascending aorta. Comparison of finite element analysis of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve showed different blood flow velocity pattern. Flow in bicuspid configurations showed asymmetrical distribution of velocity field toward the convexity of mid-ascending aorta returning symmetrical in distal ascending aorta. On the contrary, tricuspid flow was symmetrical in each aortic segment. Comparing type 1 BAV with type 2 BAV, more pronounced recirculation zones were noticed in the latter. Finally, we found that in both BAV configurations, maximum wall shear stress is highly localized at the convex portion of the mid-ascending aorta level. Comparison between models showed asymmetrical and higher flow velocity in bicuspid models, in particular in the AP configuration. Asymmetry was more pronounced at the aortic level known to be more exposed to aneurysm formation in bicuspid patients. This supports the hypothesis that hemodynamic factors may contribute to ascending aortic pathology in this subset of patients.
© 2010, Copyright the Authors. Artificial Organs © 2010, International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20618222     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00989.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  14 in total

1.  Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-derived ascending aortic flow eccentricity and flow compression are linked to aneurysm morphology†.

Authors:  Fabian A Kari; Nadja Kocher; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Anke Tscheuschler; Philipp Meffert; Bartosz Rylski; Matthias Siepe; Maximilian F Russe; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-01-30

2.  Fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model of congenital bicuspid aortic valves: effect of asymmetry on hemodynamics.

Authors:  Gil Marom; Hee-Sun Kim; Moshe Rosenfeld; Ehud Raanani; Rami Haj-Ali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  The Impact of Cardiac Motion on Aortic Valve Flow Used in Computational Simulations of the Thoracic Aorta.

Authors:  David C Wendell; Margaret M Samyn; Joseph R Cava; Mary M Krolikowski; John F LaDisa
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Predissection-derived geometric and distensibility indices reveal increased peak longitudinal stress and stiffness in patients sustaining acute type A aortic dissection: Implications for predicting dissection.

Authors:  Leonid Emerel; James Thunes; Trevor Kickliter; Marie Billaud; Julie A Phillippi; David A Vorp; Spandan Maiti; Thomas G Gleason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm wall stress analysis using patient-specific finite element modeling of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kapil Krishnan; Liang Ge; Henrik Haraldsson; Michael D Hope; David A Saloner; Julius M Guccione; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-14

6.  Characterization of abnormal wall shear stress using 4D flow MRI in human bicuspid aortopathy.

Authors:  Pim van Ooij; Wouter V Potters; Jeremy Collins; Maria Carr; James Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Paul W M Fedak; Patrick M McCarthy; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Patient-specific finite element analysis of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Andrew D Wisneski; Aart Mookhoek; Sam Chitsaz; Michael D Hope; Julius M Guccione; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2014-11

8.  Immersed boundary-finite element model of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic root.

Authors:  Vittoria Flamini; Abe DeAnda; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  Theor Comput Fluid Dyn       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 1.606

9.  Including aortic valve morphology in computational fluid dynamics simulations: initial findings and application to aortic coarctation.

Authors:  David C Wendell; Margaret M Samyn; Joseph R Cava; Laura M Ellwein; Mary M Krolikowski; Kimberly L Gandy; Andrew N Pelech; Shawn C Shadden; John F LaDisa
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Bicuspid aortic valve and thoracic aortic aneurysm: three patient populations, two disease phenotypes, and one shared genotype.

Authors:  Robert B Hinton
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 1.866

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.