Literature DB >> 19882649

Neural correlates of the spacing effect in explicit verbal semantic encoding support the deficient-processing theory.

Daniel E Callan1, Nicolas Schweighofer.   

Abstract

Spaced presentations of to-be-learned items during encoding leads to superior long-term retention over massed presentations. Despite over a century of research, the psychological and neural basis of this spacing effect however is still under investigation. To test the hypotheses that the spacing effect results either from reduction in encoding-related verbal maintenance rehearsal in massed relative to spaced presentations (deficient processing hypothesis) or from greater encoding-related elaborative rehearsal of relational information in spaced relative to massed presentations (encoding variability hypothesis), we designed a vocabulary learning experiment in which subjects encoded paired-associates, each composed of a known word paired with a novel word, in both spaced and massed conditions during functional magnetic resonance imaging. As expected, recall performance in delayed cued-recall tests was significantly better for spaced over massed conditions. Analysis of brain activity during encoding revealed that the left frontal operculum, known to be involved in encoding via verbal maintenance rehearsal, was associated with greater performance-related increased activity in the spaced relative to massed condition. Consistent with the deficient processing hypothesis, a significant decrease in activity with subsequent episodes of presentation was found in the frontal operculum for the massed but not the spaced condition. Our results suggest that the spacing effect is mediated by activity in the frontal operculum, presumably by encoding-related increased verbal maintenance rehearsal, which facilitates binding of phonological and word level verbal information for transfer into long-term memory. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19882649      PMCID: PMC6871263          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  28 in total

1.  When keeping in mind supports later bringing to mind: neural markers of phonological rehearsal predict subsequent remembering.

Authors:  L Davachi; A Maril; A D Wagner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Novelty-related activation within the medial temporal lobes.

Authors:  Nicola M Hunkin; Andrew R Mayes; Lloyd J Gregory; Amanda K Nicholas; Julia A Nunn; Michael J Brammer; Edward T Bullmore; Steve C R Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Hippocampal contributions to episodic encoding: insights from relational and item-based learning.

Authors:  Lila Davachi; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Jeffery A Jones; Akiko M Callan; Reiko Akahane-Yamada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The role of parietal cortex in verbal working memory.

Authors:  J Jonides; E H Schumacher; E E Smith; R A Koeppe; E Awh; P A Reuter-Lorenz; C Marshuetz; C R Willis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment.

Authors:  R Epstein; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Reinforcement as consolidation.

Authors:  T K Landauer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Positive and negative modulation of word learning by reward anticipation.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Human hippocampus associates information in memory.

Authors:  K Henke; B Weber; S Kneifel; H G Wieser; A Buck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  12 in total

1.  Mechanisms of the contextual interference effect in individuals poststroke.

Authors:  Nicolas Schweighofer; Jeong-Yoon Lee; Hui-Ting Goh; Youggeun Choi; Sung Shin Kim; Jill Campbell Stewart; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Re-learning and remembering in the lesioned brain.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Robert W Wiley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Beyond consensus: Embracing heterogeneity in curated neuroimaging meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gia H Ngo; Simon B Eickhoff; Minh Nguyen; Gunes Sevinc; Peter T Fox; R Nathan Spreng; B T Thomas Yeo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Brain regions that show repetition suppression and enhancement: A meta-analysis of 137 neuroimaging experiments.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Brain regions and functional interactions supporting early word recognition in the face of input variability.

Authors:  Silvia Benavides-Varela; Roma Siugzdaite; David Maximiliano Gómez; Francesco Macagno; Luigi Cattarossi; Jacques Mehler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Spaced Learning Enhances Episodic Memory by Increasing Neural Pattern Similarity Across Repetitions.

Authors:  Kanyin Feng; Xiao Zhao; Jing Liu; Ying Cai; Zhifang Ye; Chuansheng Chen; Gui Xue
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Spaced learning enhances subsequent recognition memory by reducing neural repetition suppression.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Leilei Mei; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Russell Poldrack; Qi Dong
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  A randomized crossover single-case series comparing blocked versus random treatment for anomia.

Authors:  Victoria A Diedrichs; Jennifer P Lundine; Deena Schwen Blackett; Alexandra Zezinka Durfee; Xueliang Jeff Pan; Stacy M Harnish
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.928

9.  Facilitating memory for novel characters by reducing neural repetition suppression in the left fusiform cortex.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Leilei Mei; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Russell A Poldrack; Qi Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The right time to learn: mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning.

Authors:  Paul Smolen; Yili Zhang; John H Byrne
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.