OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate participant recruitment for a research study conducted in primary care offices. METHODS: Nine recruiters administered a written survey to 1485 primary care patients (from 25 practices) during baseline and 1-year follow-up of a quality improvement study aimed at increasing colorectal cancer screening. Before recruitment, recruiters attended training sessions, during which they received tools and information designed to facilitate successful recruitment. Quantitative and qualitative recruitment data were analyzed to assess and describe recruitment efforts. RESULTS: The overall practice-level recruitment rate was 72.7% (range, 56.3% to 91.4%). Practice characteristics did not affect the recruitment rate. Recruitment rate differed significantly between recruiters (P = .0007) as did nonparticipants' reasons for refusal (P < .0001). Anticipated barriers to recruitment (older age of sampled population, lack of incentives, and discomfort discussing colorectal cancer) did not occur. Two key strategies facilitated recruitment: ((1)) recruiter flexibility and ((2)) building rapport with participants. CONCLUSION: Recruiters may be more effective if they are able to adapt to participants' needs and successfully build rapport with potential participants. The likelihood of recruitment success may be increased by anticipating potential recruitment barriers and providing training that minimizes the inherent variation that exists among recruiters.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate participant recruitment for a research study conducted in primary care offices. METHODS: Nine recruiters administered a written survey to 1485 primary care patients (from 25 practices) during baseline and 1-year follow-up of a quality improvement study aimed at increasing colorectal cancer screening. Before recruitment, recruiters attended training sessions, during which they received tools and information designed to facilitate successful recruitment. Quantitative and qualitative recruitment data were analyzed to assess and describe recruitment efforts. RESULTS: The overall practice-level recruitment rate was 72.7% (range, 56.3% to 91.4%). Practice characteristics did not affect the recruitment rate. Recruitment rate differed significantly between recruiters (P = .0007) as did nonparticipants' reasons for refusal (P < .0001). Anticipated barriers to recruitment (older age of sampled population, lack of incentives, and discomfort discussing colorectal cancer) did not occur. Two key strategies facilitated recruitment: ((1)) recruiter flexibility and ((2)) building rapport with participants. CONCLUSION: Recruiters may be more effective if they are able to adapt to participants' needs and successfully build rapport with potential participants. The likelihood of recruitment success may be increased by anticipating potential recruitment barriers and providing training that minimizes the inherent variation that exists among recruiters.
Authors: Carrie N Klabunde; Paul S Frame; Ann Meadow; Elizabeth Jones; Marion Nadel; Sally W Vernon Journal: Prev Med Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: S Margitić; M A Sevick; M Miller; C Albright; J Banton; K Callahan; M Garcia; L Gibbons; B J Levine; R Anderson; W Ettinger Journal: Prev Med Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Seth W Glickman; Kevin J Anstrom; Li Lin; Abhinav Chandra; Daniel T Laskowitz; Christopher W Woods; Debra H Freeman; Monica Kraft; Laura M Beskow; Kevin P Weinfurt; Kevin A Schulman; Charles B Cairns Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2008-01-11 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Sandra Crouse Quinn; James Butler; Craig S Fryer; Mary A Garza; Kevin H Kim; Christopher Ryan; Stephen B Thomas Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Christina B Felsen; Alicja Piasecki; Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: J Community Health Date: 2011-08
Authors: Maria E Gyure; John M Quillin; Vivian M Rodríguez; Monika S Markowitz; Rosalie Corona; Joseph Borzelleca; Deborah J Bowen; Alexander H Krist; Joann N Bodurtha Journal: IRB Date: 2014 Nov-Dec
Authors: Craig S Fryer; Susan R Passmore; Raymond C Maietta; Jeff Petruzzelli; Erica Casper; Natasha A Brown; James Butler; Mary A Garza; Stephen B Thomas; Sandra C Quinn Journal: Qual Health Res Date: 2015-03-13
Authors: Eric K Shaw; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Alicja Piasecki; Shawna V Hudson; Jeanne M Ferrante; Reuben R McDaniel; Paul A Nutting; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Shawna V Hudson; Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Karissa A Hahn; Eric K Shaw; Jennifer Hemler; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Erica Rose Denhoff; Carly E Milliren; Sarah D de Ferranti; Sarah K Steltz; Stavroula K Osganian Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kari L Ruud; Annie Leblanc; Rebecca J Mullan; Laurie J Pencille; Kristina Tiedje; Megan E Branda; Holly K Van Houten; Sara R Heim; Margary Kurland; Nilay D Shah; Barbara P Yawn; Victor M Montori Journal: Trials Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 2.279