B F Crabtree1, W L Miller, K C Stange. 1. UMDNJ-RWJ Medical School, Department of Family Medicine, One Robert Wood Johnson Place, MEB 242, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019, USA. Crabtrbf@umdnj.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to understand family practices from the ground up through intensive direct observation of the practice environment and patient care. METHODS: Eighteen practices were purposefully drawn from a random sample of Nebraska family practices that had earlier participated in a study of preventive service delivery. Each practice was studied intensely over a 4- to 12-week period using a comparative case study design that included extended direct observation of the practice environment and clinical encounters, formal and informal interviews of clinicians and staff, and medical record review. DESIGN: This multimethod assessment process (MAP) provided insights into a wide range of practice activities ranging from descriptions of the organization and patient care activities to quantitative documentation of physician- and practice-level delivery of a wide range of evidence-based preventive services. Initial insights guided subsequent data collection and analysis and led to the integration of complexity science concepts into the design. In response to the needs and wishes of the participants, practice meetings were initiated to provide feedback, resulting in a more collaborative model of practice-based research. CONCLUSIONS: Our multimethod assessment process provided rich data for describing multiple aspects of primary care practice, testing a priori hypotheses, discovering new insights grounded in the actual experience of practice participants, and fostering collaborative practice change.
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to understand family practices from the ground up through intensive direct observation of the practice environment and patient care. METHODS: Eighteen practices were purposefully drawn from a random sample of Nebraska family practices that had earlier participated in a study of preventive service delivery. Each practice was studied intensely over a 4- to 12-week period using a comparative case study design that included extended direct observation of the practice environment and clinical encounters, formal and informal interviews of clinicians and staff, and medical record review. DESIGN: This multimethod assessment process (MAP) provided insights into a wide range of practice activities ranging from descriptions of the organization and patient care activities to quantitative documentation of physician- and practice-level delivery of a wide range of evidence-based preventive services. Initial insights guided subsequent data collection and analysis and led to the integration of complexity science concepts into the design. In response to the needs and wishes of the participants, practice meetings were initiated to provide feedback, resulting in a more collaborative model of practice-based research. CONCLUSIONS: Our multimethod assessment process provided rich data for describing multiple aspects of primary care practice, testing a priori hypotheses, discovering new insights grounded in the actual experience of practice participants, and fostering collaborative practice change.
Authors: Carlos Roberto Jaén; Benjamin F Crabtree; Raymond F Palmer; Robert L Ferrer; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Elizabeth E Stewart; Robert Wood; Marivel Davila; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Malaz A Boustani; Greg A Sachs; Catherine A Alder; Stephanie Munger; Cathy C Schubert; Mary Guerriero Austrom; Ann M Hake; Frederick W Unverzagt; Martin Farlow; Brandy R Matthews; Anthony J Perkins; Robin A Beck; Christopher M Callahan Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Eric K Shaw; Sabrina M Chase; Jenna Howard; Paul A Nutting; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2012 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Michael A Schillaci; Howard Waitzkin; E Ann Carson; Cynthia M Lopez; Deborah A Boehm; Leslie A Lopez; Sheila F Mahoney Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; Kurt C Stange; Carlos Roberto Jaén Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Benjamin F Crabtree; Sabrina M Chase; Christopher G Wise; Gordon D Schiff; Laura A Schmidt; Jeanette R Goyzueta; Rebecca A Malouin; Susan M C Payne; Michael T Quinn; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Carlos Roberto Jaén Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: John Scott; Alfred Tallia; Jesse C Crosson; A John Orzano; Christine Stroebel; Barbara DiCicco-Bloom; Dena O'Malley; Eric Shaw; Benjamin Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Karissa A Hahn; Shawna V Hudson; Eric K Shaw; Jesse C Crosson; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.254