Literature DB >> 18191297

Challenges in enrollment of minority, pediatric, and geriatric patients in emergency and acute care clinical research.

Seth W Glickman1, Kevin J Anstrom, Li Lin, Abhinav Chandra, Daniel T Laskowitz, Christopher W Woods, Debra H Freeman, Monica Kraft, Laura M Beskow, Kevin P Weinfurt, Kevin A Schulman, Charles B Cairns.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Emergency department (ED) -based clinical research has the potential to include patient populations that are typically underrepresented in clinical research. The objective of this study is to assess how emergency clinical care and research processes, informed consent, and patient demographic factors (age, sex, and ethnicity/race) affect enrollment and consent in clinical research in the ED.
METHODS: This was an analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients (aged 2 to 101 years) eligible for one of 7 clinical research studies from February 2005 to April 2007 in an academic ED. We measured rates of enrollment and consent in the clinical studies.
RESULTS: One thousand two hundred two of the 4418 patients screened for participation in 7 clinical studies were clinically eligible for enrollment. Of the 868 patients who were able to provide a voluntary decision regarding consent, 639 (73.6%) agreed to participate; an overall enrollment rate of 53.2%. The mean age of patients enrolled was 51.8 years (range 3 to 98 years). Black patients (49.2% enrollment) and Latino patients (18.4% enrollment) were less likely to be enrolled in comparison with white patients (58.3% enrollment) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] of enrollment for blacks=0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 0.82; adjusted OR of enrollment for Latinos=0.16; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.33). Enrollment rates were lower among pediatric (40.0%) and geriatric patients (49.1%) in comparison with adult patients ages 18 to 64 years (55.5%) (adjusted OR of enrollment for pediatric patients=0.70, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.43; adjusted OR of enrollment for geriatric patients=0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.90). Unique issues contributing to underenrollment included challenges in consent among pediatric and elderly patients, language issues in Latino patients, reduced voluntary consent rates among black patients, and perhaps underuse of minimal risk waivers.
CONCLUSION: In a large academic ED, minority, pediatric, and geriatric patients were less likely to be enrolled in acute care clinical research studies than middle-aged whites. Enrollment and consent strategies designed to enhance research participation in these important patient populations may be necessary to address disparities in the development and application of evidence-based emergency and acute care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18191297     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  21 in total

1.  Surrogate receptivity to participation in critical illness genetic research: aligning research oversight and stakeholder concerns.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Kevin Butler; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Brian R Clarridge; Carie R Kennedy; Jessica LeBlanc; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Policy solutions to recruiting and retaining minority children in research.

Authors:  Jean L Raphael; K Casey Lion; Cynthia F Bearer
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Conducting Accessible Research: Including People With Disabilities in Public Health, Epidemiological, and Outcomes Studies.

Authors:  Dianne Rios; Susan Magasi; Catherine Novak; Mark Harniss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Perspectives of Decisional Surrogates and Patients Regarding Critical Illness Genetic Research.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Carie R Kennedy; Jessica LeBlanc; Alexander Eastman; Jennifer Barillas; Catherine M Wittgen; Kathryn Indsey; Rumel S Mahmood; Brian R Clarridge
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-05-01

5.  Minimizing Attrition for Multisite Emergency Care Research.

Authors:  Bret A Nicks; Manish N Shah; David H Adler; Aveh Bastani; Christopher W Baugh; Jeffrey M Caterino; Carol L Clark; Deborah B Diercks; Judd E Hollander; Susan E Malveau; Daniel K Nishijima; Kirk A Stiffler; Alan B Storrow; Scott T Wilber; Annick N Yagapen; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Strategies for in-person recruitment: lessons learned from a New Jersey primary care research network (NJPCRN) study.

Authors:  Christina B Felsen; Eric K Shaw; Jeanne M Ferrante; Lorraine J Lacroix; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

7.  Factors affecting consent in pediatric critical care research.

Authors:  Kusum Menon; Roxanne E Ward; Isabelle Gaboury; Margot Thomas; Ari Joffe; Karen Burns; Deborah Cook
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  The use of delayed telephone informed consent for observational emergency medicine research is ethical and effective.

Authors:  Steven R Offerman; Daniel K Nishijima; Dustin W Ballard; Uli K Chetipally; David R Vinson; James F Holmes
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Who will participate in acute stroke trials?

Authors:  S E Kasner; A Del Giudice; S Rosenberg; M Sheen; J M Luciano; B L Cucchiara; S R Messé; L H Sansing; J M Baren
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Randomized trials in emergency medicine journals, 2008 to 2011.

Authors:  Christopher W Jones; Katherine M Hunold; Cameron G Isaacs; Timothy F Platts-Mills
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.