Literature DB >> 20610837

Quantifying sensory eye dominance in the normal visual system: a new technique and insights into variation across traditional tests.

Jingrong Li1, Carly S Y Lam, Minbin Yu, Robert F Hess, Lily Y L Chan, Goro Maehara, George C Woo, Benjamin Thompson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although eye dominance assessment is used to assist clinical decision-making, current understanding is limited by inconsistencies across the range of available tests. A new psychophysical test of sensory eye dominance has been developed that objectively measures the relative contribution of each eye to a fused suprathreshold binocular percept.
METHODS: Six standard tests and the newly developed test were used to measure motor and sensory dominance in a group of 44 binocularly normal individuals (mean age, 29.5 ± 9.10 years). The new test required observers to perform a motion coherence task under dichoptic viewing conditions, wherein a population of moving, luminance-defined signal (coherently moving) and noise (randomly moving) dots were presented separately to each eye. The observers judged the motion direction of the signal dots. Motion coherence thresholds were measured by varying the ratio of signal-to-noise dots, in a staircase procedure.
RESULTS: The new dichoptic motion coherence threshold test revealed a clear bimodal distribution of sensory eye dominance strength, wherein the majority of the participants (61%) showed weak dominance, but a significant minority (39%) showed strong dominance. Subsequent analysis revealed that the strong-dominance group showed greater consistency across the range of traditional eye dominance tests used.
CONCLUSIONS: This new quantitative dichoptic motion coherence threshold technique suggests that there are two separate sensory eye dominance strength distributions among observers with normal binocular vision: weak and strong eye dominance. This finding may provide a basis for clinical decision-making by indicating whether eye dominance is likely to be an important consideration in a particular patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20610837     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  18 in total

1.  The horizontal dark oculomotor rest position.

Authors:  Eun H Kim; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparing accommodative function between the dominant and non-dominant eye.

Authors:  Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Colm McAlinden; Abbas Azimi; Mina Sobhani; Eirini Skiadaresi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  A binocular perimetry study of the causes and implications of sensory eye dominance.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The measurement and treatment of suppression in amblyopia.

Authors:  Joanna M Black; Robert F Hess; Jeremy R Cooperstock; Long To; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Relative contributions of the two eyes to perceived egocentric visual direction in normal binocular vision.

Authors:  Deepika Sridhar; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Peripheral prism glasses: effects of dominance, suppression, and background.

Authors:  Nicole C Ross; Alex R Bowers; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  In vivo functional localization of the temporal monocular crescent representation in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Cristen LaPierre; Christopher E Vaughn; Thomas Witzel; Jason P Stockmann; Jonathan R Polimeni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Hand and Eye Dominance in Sport: Are Cricket Batters Taught to Bat Back-to-Front?

Authors:  David L Mann; Oliver R Runswick; Peter M Allen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Monocular perceptual learning of contrast detection facilitates binocular combination in adults with anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Zidong Chen; Jinrong Li; Jing Liu; Xiaoxiao Cai; Junpeng Yuan; Daming Deng; Minbin Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  An automated and objective cover test to measure heterophoria.

Authors:  Clara Mestre; Carles Otero; Fernando Díaz-Doutón; Josselin Gautier; Jaume Pujol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.