Literature DB >> 23708700

The horizontal dark oculomotor rest position.

Eun H Kim1, Tara L Alvarez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study sought to investigate whether eye dominance and age are related to the stimulus-free oculomotor resting state described via the dark disconjugate position (near or far), the dark conjugate position (left to right), and the near dissociated phoria.
METHODS: Nineteen non-presbyopes and 25 presbyopes with normal binocular vision participated in two identical sessions. The left-eye and the right-eye positions were recorded using a video-based infrared eye tracker while the subjects were in total darkness. Dark disconjugate responses and dark conjugate responses were calculated by computing the difference and the average of the left-eye and the right-eye response, respectively. The right-eye decaying to the phoria level was recorded for 15 s.
RESULTS: A one-way ANOVA assessed statistical differences in dark conjugate and dark disconjugate positions, comparing 1) the right-eye and the left-eye sensory and/or motor dominant groups and 2) the non-presbyope and presbyope groups. The test-retests of the dark disconjugate position, the dark conjugate position and the near dissociated heterophoria were high between sessions (r > 0.85; p < 0.00001). For non-presbyopes the right-eye (left-eye) motor and sensory dominant subjects showed a rightward (leftward) dark conjugate position (p < 0.01). The dark disconjugate position was receded in presbyopes compared to non-presbyopes (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The data support that the left-eye, or the right-eye, motor and sensory dominance predicts the direction of the dark conjugate position. Future studies could investigate the underlying neural substrates that may, in part, contribute to the resting state of the oculomotor system in a stimulus-free environment. Knowledge of the brain-behavior governing visual-field preference has implications for understanding the natural aging process of the visual system.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23708700     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2379-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  62 in total

1.  Fixation disparity and accommodation for stimuli closer and more distant than oculomotor tonic positions.

Authors:  W Jaschinski
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Dynamics of horizontal vergence movements: interaction with horizontal and vertical saccades and relation with monocular preferences.

Authors:  A F van Leeuwen; H Collewijn; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Eye closure in darkness animates sensory systems.

Authors:  Esther Marx; Thomas Stephan; Annina Nolte; Angela Deutschländer; Klaus C Seelos; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Eye dominance predicts fMRI signals in human retinotopic cortex.

Authors:  Janine D Mendola; Ian P Conner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Quantification of heterophoria and phoria adaptation using an automated objective system compared to clinical methods.

Authors:  Sang J Han; Yi Guo; Bérangère Granger-Donetti; Vincent R Vicci; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Characteristics of dynamic accommodation responses: comparison between the dominant and non-dominant eyes.

Authors:  K Ibi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Physiological exophoria.

Authors:  B E Freier; L D Pickwell
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Quantifying sensory eye dominance in the normal visual system: a new technique and insights into variation across traditional tests.

Authors:  Jingrong Li; Carly S Y Lam; Minbin Yu; Robert F Hess; Lily Y L Chan; Goro Maehara; George C Woo; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Ocular dominance diagnosis and its influence in monovision.

Authors:  Olga Seijas; Pilar Gómez de Liaño; Rosario Gómez de Liaño; Clare J Roberts; Elena Piedrahita; Ester Diaz
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Aging and Visual Attention.

Authors:  David J Madden
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  The influence of age on adaptation of disparity vergence and phoria.

Authors:  Tara L Alvarez; Eun H Kim; Chang Yaramothu; Bérangère Granger-Donetti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Bilateral Occlusion Reduces the Ocular Deviation in Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  John R Economides; Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Adaptation to Progressive Additive Lenses: Potential Factors to Consider.

Authors:  Tara L Alvarez; Eun H Kim; Bérangère Granger-Donetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.