Literature DB >> 23271400

The measurement and treatment of suppression in amblyopia.

Joanna M Black1, Robert F Hess, Jeremy R Cooperstock, Long To, Benjamin Thompson.   

Abstract

Amblyopia, a developmental disorder of the visual cortex, is one of the leading causes of visual dysfunction in the working age population. Current estimates put the prevalence of amblyopia at approximately 1-3%(1-3), the majority of cases being monocular(2). Amblyopia is most frequently caused by ocular misalignment (strabismus), blur induced by unequal refractive error (anisometropia), and in some cases by form deprivation. Although amblyopia is initially caused by abnormal visual input in infancy, once established, the visual deficit often remains when normal visual input has been restored using surgery and/or refractive correction. This is because amblyopia is the result of abnormal visual cortex development rather than a problem with the amblyopic eye itself(4,5) . Amblyopia is characterized by both monocular and binocular deficits(6,7) which include impaired visual acuity and poor or absent stereopsis respectively. The visual dysfunction in amblyopia is often associated with a strong suppression of the inputs from the amblyopic eye under binocular viewing conditions(8). Recent work has indicated that suppression may play a central role in both the monocular and binocular deficits associated with amblyopia(9,10) . Current clinical tests for suppression tend to verify the presence or absence of suppression rather than giving a quantitative measurement of the degree of suppression. Here we describe a technique for measuring amblyopic suppression with a compact, portable device(11,12) . The device consists of a laptop computer connected to a pair of virtual reality goggles. The novelty of the technique lies in the way we present visual stimuli to measure suppression. Stimuli are shown to the amblyopic eye at high contrast while the contrast of the stimuli shown to the non-amblyopic eye are varied. Patients perform a simple signal/noise task that allows for a precise measurement of the strength of excitatory binocular interactions. The contrast offset at which neither eye has a performance advantage is a measure of the "balance point" and is a direct measure of suppression. This technique has been validated psychophysically both in control(13,14) and patient(6,9,11) populations. In addition to measuring suppression this technique also forms the basis of a novel form of treatment to decrease suppression over time and improve binocular and often monocular function in adult patients with amblyopia(12,15,16) . This new treatment approach can be deployed either on the goggle system described above or on a specially modified iPod touch device(15).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23271400      PMCID: PMC3575204          DOI: 10.3791/3927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  20 in total

Review 1.  Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment.

Authors:  Ann L Webber; Joanne Wood
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Tim S Meese; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Measurement of suprathreshold binocular interactions in amblyopia.

Authors:  B Mansouri; B Thompson; R F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  A binocular approach to treating amblyopia: antisuppression therapy.

Authors:  Robert F Hess; Behzad Mansouri; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Relating binocular and monocular vision in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Ritwick Agrawal; Ian P Conner; J V Odom; Terry L Schwartz; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06

7.  Cortical deficits in human amblyopia: their regional distribution and their relationship to the contrast detection deficit.

Authors:  Xingfeng Li; Serge O Dumoulin; Behzad Mansouri; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Prevalence of refractive error in Singaporean Chinese children: the strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive error in young Singaporean Children (STARS) study.

Authors:  Mohamed Dirani; Yiong-Huak Chan; Gus Gazzard; Dana Marie Hornbeak; Seo-Wei Leo; Prabakaran Selvaraj; Brendan Zhou; Terri L Young; Paul Mitchell; Rohit Varma; Tien Yin Wong; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The contrast dependence of the cortical fMRI deficit in amblyopia; a selective loss at higher contrasts.

Authors:  Robert F Hess; Xingfeng Li; Guangming Lu; Benjamin Thompson; Bruce C Hansen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  14 in total

1.  Beyond Rehabilitation of Acuity, Ocular Alignment, and Binocularity in Infantile Strabismus.

Authors:  Chantal Milleret; Emmanuel Bui Quoc
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-18

2.  Perceptual learning improves stereoacuity in amblyopia.

Authors:  Jie Xi; Wu-Li Jia; Li-Xia Feng; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances recovery of stereopsis in adults with amblyopia.

Authors:  Daniel P Spiegel; Jinrong Li; Robert F Hess; Winston D Byblow; Daming Deng; Minbin Yu; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 4.  Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.

Authors:  Vijay Tailor; Siobhan Ludden; Manuela Bossi; Catey Bunce; John A Greenwood; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-07

5.  Binocular summation and other forms of non-dominant eye contribution in individuals with strabismic amblyopia during habitual viewing.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Gurvinder K Panesar; Andrew J Scally; Ian E Pacey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Global processing in amblyopia: a review.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Joanna Black; Shuan Dai; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-17

7.  Origins of strabismus and loss of binocular vision.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bui Quoc; Chantal Milleret
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-25

8.  Assessing Suppression in Amblyopic Children With a Dichoptic Eye Chart.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Sarah E Morale; Reed M Jost; Angie De La Cruz; Krista R Kelly; Yi-Zhong Wang; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Binocular treatment of amblyopia using videogames (BRAVO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Cindy X Guo; Raiju J Babu; Joanna M Black; William R Bobier; Carly S Y Lam; Shuan Dai; Tina Y Gao; Robert F Hess; Michelle Jenkins; Yannan Jiang; Lionel Kowal; Varsha Parag; Jayshree South; Sandra Elfride Staffieri; Natalie Walker; Angela Wadham; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.

Authors:  Vijay Tailor; Manuela Bossi; Catey Bunce; John A Greenwood; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.