Literature DB >> 20610835

Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new irrigated-tip catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation.

K R Julian Chun1, Erik Wissner, Buelent Koektuerk, Melanie Konstantinidou, Boris Schmidt, Thomas Zerm, Andreas Metzner, Roland Tilz, Sigrid Boczor, Alexander Fuernkranz, Feifan Ouyang, Karl-Heinz Kuck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lack of an irrigated-tip magnetic catheter has limited the role of remote-controlled magnetic navigation (Niobe II, Stereotaxis) for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND
RESULTS: A novel 3.5-mm-tip irrigated magnetic catheter (group 1, Thermocool Navistar RMT, Biosense Webster) was used for 3D left atrial reconstruction (CARTO RMT) and remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation. A redesigned catheter was used in group 2. The primary end point was wide area circumferential pulmonary vein isolation confirmed by spiral catheter recording during ablation; secondary end points included procedural data, complications, and AF recurrence. Fifty-six consecutive patients [group 1: 28 patients, 22 males, age 64 (38 to 78) years, left atrium: 47 (34 to 52) mm; paroxysmal AF: n=21, persistent AF: n=7; group 2: 28 patients, 20 males, age 60 (24 to 78) years, left atrium: 40 (35 to 53) mm; paroxysmal AF: n=18, persistent AF: n=10] were included. The primary end point was achieved in a total of 52 of 56 (93%) patients. Median procedure duration was 315 (125 to 550) minutes (group 1: 370 [230 to 550] minutes; group 2: 243 [125 to 450] minutes). Median fluoroscopy exposure to the investigator was reduced by 31%. Tip charring in 17 of 28 (61%) and complications in 3 of 28 (11%) patients in group 1 resulted in a catheter redesign. Sinus rhythm was maintained by 35 of 50 (70%) patients during a median follow-up period of 545 (100 to 683) days.
CONCLUSIONS: Remote-controlled magnetic AF ablation with real-time verification of pulmonary vein isolation is feasible with a comparable success rate to manual ablation. Safety improved after a redesign of the catheter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20610835     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.942672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  18 in total

Review 1.  Irrigated-Tip Magnetic Catheter Ablation Of AF: ALong-Term Prospective Study In 130 Patients.

Authors:  Julian Chun
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2011-07-15

Review 2.  [Three-dimensional mapping systems].

Authors:  Philipp Halbfass; Oliver Turschner; Christian Mahnkopf; Johannes Brachmann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2012-11-28

3.  Magnetically guided irrigated gold-tip catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation--techniques, procedural parameters and outcome.

Authors:  Bogdan Muntean; Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben; Johannes Heintze; Jürgen Vogt; Dieter Horstkotte; Georg Nölker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Remote magnetic navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation: single-catheter technique or additional use of a circular mapping catheter?

Authors:  Dirk Vollmann; Lars Lüthje; Joachim Seegers; Christian Sohns; Samuel Sossalla; Jan Sohns; Christian Röver; Gerd Hasenfuß; Markus Zabel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Role of Remote Navigation Systems in AF Ablation.

Authors:  Boris Schmidt; Britta Schulte-Hahn; Bernd Nowak; Verena Windhorst; Verena Windhorst; Kyoung Ryul Julian Chun
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2011-02-22

Review 6.  Differences In Tissue Injury and Ablation Outcomes In Atrial Fibrillation Patients - Manual versus Robotic Catheters.

Authors:  Georg Nölker; Dieter Horstkotte; Klaus Jürgen Gutleben
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

7.  Magnetic guidance versus manual control: comparison of radiofrequency lesion dimensions and evaluation of the effect of heart wall motion in a myocardial phantom.

Authors:  Abhishek Bhaskaran; M A Tony Barry; Sara I Al Raisi; William Chik; Doan Trang Nguyen; Jim Pouliopoulos; Chrishan Nalliah; Roger Hendricks; Stuart Thomas; Alistair L McEwan; Pramesh Kovoor; Aravinda Thiagalingam
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Significant reduction in procedure duration in remote magnetic-guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the third-generation magnetic navigation system.

Authors:  Tilman Maurer; Christian Sohns; Sebastian Deiss; Laura Rottner; Peter Wohlmuth; Bruno Reißmann; Christian H Heeger; Christine Lemes; Johannes Riedl; Francesco Santoro; Shibu Mathew; Andreas Metzner; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Erik Wissner
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Single-ring ablation compared with standard circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using remote magnetic catheter navigation.

Authors:  Christian Sohns; Leonard Bergau; Joachim Seegers; Lars Lüthje; Dirk Vollmann; Markus Zabel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 10.  Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Magnetic Navigation Comparison With Conventional Approach During Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Tolga Aksu; Serdar Bozyel; Ebru Golcuk; Kývanc Yalin; Tumer Erdem Guler
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.