Literature DB >> 20609314

Inter- and intra-observer variability in the echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular function.

Marta Pinedo1, Eduardo Villacorta, Cristina Tapia, Roman Arnold, Javier López, Ana Revilla, Itziar Gómez, Enrique Fulquet, José A San Román.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: Echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular systolic function remains subject to debate because of the anatomic peculiarities of the right ventricle. Several methods have been developed for quantifying right ventricular systolic function. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and reproducibility of a number of echocardiographic parameters by evaluating their inter-observer and intra-observer variability.
METHODS: The study included 30 patients with isolated mitral valvulopathy scheduled for heart surgery. All underwent echocardiography, which was performed independently by two echocardiographers within 24 hours. The intra-observer analysis was carried out using the recorded images at least 1 month after they had been obtained. The parameters studied were the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), the tricuspid annular peak systolic velocity on tissue Doppler imaging, right ventricular outflow tract fractional shortening, fractional shortening of right ventricular diameters, and fractional shortening of right ventricular areas. Variability was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: The degree of concordance on TAPSE and tricuspid annular peak systolic velocity measurement was good in the inter-observer analysis and excellent in the intra-observer analysis. However, concordance was poor on measurements of the fractional shortening of the right ventricular outflow tract, areas and diameters on both inter-observer and intra-observer analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: The most reliable and reproducible echocardiographic parameters for evaluating right ventricular systolic function in patients with isolated mitral valvulopathy were the TAPSE and the tricuspid annular peak systolic velocity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20609314     DOI: 10.1016/s1885-5857(10)70165-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8932            Impact factor:   4.753


  13 in total

1.  An open source benchmarked toolbox for cardiovascular waveform and interval analysis.

Authors:  Adriana N Vest; Giulia Da Poian; Qiao Li; Chengyu Liu; Shamim Nemati; Amit J Shah; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  On the search for the right definition of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka; Karolina Kupczyńska; Piotr Dobrowolski; Błażej Michalski; Miłosz J Jaguszewski; Waldemar Banasiak; Paweł Burchardt; Łukasz Chrzanowski; Szymon Darocha; Justyna Domienik-Karłowicz; Jarosław Drożdż; Marcin Fijałkowski; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Marcin Gruchała; Ewa A Jankowska; Piotr Jankowski; Jarosław D Kasprzak; Wojciech Kosmala; Piotr Lipiec; Przemysław Mitkowski; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec; Piotr Szymański; Agnieszka Tycińska; Wojciech Wańha; Maciej Wybraniec; Adam Witkowski; Piotr Ponikowski; On Behalf Of "Club 30" Of The Polish Cardiac Society
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Generalizable fully automated multi-label segmentation of four-chamber view echocardiograms based on deep convolutional adversarial networks.

Authors:  Arghavan Arafati; Daisuke Morisawa; Michael R Avendi; M Reza Amini; Ramin A Assadi; Hamid Jafarkhani; Arash Kheradvar
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  The feasibility of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion performed by transesophageal echocardiography throughout heart surgery and its interchangeability with transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  A Korshin; L Grønlykke; J C Nilsson; H Møller-Sørensen; N Ihlemann; M Kjøller; S Damgaard; P Lehnert; C Hassager; J Kjaergaard; H B Ravn
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular functions in nondiabetic normotensive hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Yusuf Karavelioğlu; Sultan Özkurt; Macit Kalçik; Hekim Karapinar; Arif Arisoy
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2015-09-28

6.  Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Francisco Alpendurada; Kaushik Guha; Rakesh Sharma; Tevfik F Ismail; Amy Clifford; Winston Banya; Raad H Mohiaddin; Dudley J Pennell; Martin R Cowie; Theresa McDonagh; Sanjay K Prasad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Right ventricle dysfunction assessment for transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: A matter of debate.

Authors:  Alberto Preda; Francesco Melillo; Luca Liberale; Fabrizio Montecucco; Eustachio Agricola
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.722

8.  Reduced fractional shortening of right ventricular outflow tract is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Masashi Yamaguchi; Toshihiro Tsuruda; Yuki Watanabe; Hisamitsu Onitsuka; Kuniko Furukawa; Takeshi Ideguchi; Junji Kawagoe; Tetsunori Ishikawa; Johji Kato; Makoto Takenaga; Kazuo Kitamura
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  Subtle increases in heart size persist into adulthood in growth restricted babies: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study.

Authors:  Clare Arnott; Michael R Skilton; Saku Ruohonen; Markus Juonala; Jorma S A Viikari; Mika Kähönen; Terho Lehtimäki; Tomi Laitinen; David S Celermajer; Olli T Raitakari
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-08-28

10.  Diagnostic Value of Selected Echocardiographic Variables to Identify Pulmonary Hypertension in Dogs with Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease.

Authors:  A Tidholm; K Höglund; J Häggström; I Ljungvall
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.