Benefit of the basophil activation test in deciding when to reintroduce cow's milk in allergic children.

BACKGROUND: Oral challenges are required to establish the persistence or resolution of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy (CMA). Determining the appropriate timing for challenging is the main difficulty. The benefit of the basophil activation test (BAT) in predicting a child's reaction to the oral challenge was evaluated and compared to the specific IgE and skin prick tests' (SPT) results.
METHODS: One hundred and twelve consecutive children with CMA admitted for an oral challenge to reassess their allergy were included. Allergen-induced basophil activation was detected as a CD63-upregulation by flow cytometry.
RESULTS: Thirty-six children (32%) had a positive oral challenge. The percentage of activated basophils in patients with a positive challenge (mean = 20.9; SD = 18.8) was significantly higher than that of patients with a negative challenge (mean = 3.9; SD = 9.8, P < 0.0001), and was well correlated with the eliciting dose of cow's milk (P < 0.0001). The BAT had an efficiency of 90%, a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 90%, and positive and negative predictive values of 81% and 96% in detecting persistently allergic patients. The area under the ROC curve was 0.866. These scores were higher than those obtained with SPT and IgE values, whichever positivity cut-point was chosen. Referring to a decisional algorithm combining BAT, specific IgE and SPT allowed the correct identification of 94% of patients as tolerant or persistently allergic to cow's milk proteins (CMP) in our cohort.
CONCLUSION: The BAT could be a valuable tool in the management of paediatric CMA in addition to specific IgE quantification and SPT, by contributing in determining whether an oral challenge can safely be undertaken.