Literature DB >> 25100882

Postoperative Health-Related Quality of Life of Cervical Cancer Patients - A Comparison between the Wertheim-Meigs Operation and Total Mesometrial Resection (TMMR).

E Sowa1, S Kuhnt2, A Hinz2, C Schröder2, T Deutsch3, K Geue2.   

Abstract

Introduction: The present study compares for the first time the standard therapy for cervical cancer in FIGO-stages IB-IIB, radical hysterectomy according to the Wertheim-Meigs operation, with the newly developed, nerve-sparing surgical technique, total mesometrial resection (TMMR) with regard to postoperative, health-related quality of life. Method: In the framework of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study a total of 110 cervical cancer patients were interviewed once by means of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the cervical cancer module (EORTC QLQ-CX24). The influence of the surgical method was investigated by analysis of covariance under control of age and the time elapsed between treatment and interview.
Results: An influence of the therapeutic method was demonstrated in the EORTC scales physical function (p = 0.047), role function (p = 0.016), fatigue (p = 0.028), pain (p = 0.018), shortness of breath (p = 0.034), lack of appetite (p = 0.006) and diarrhoea (p = 0.012) in favour of the 74 women treated by TMMR. With regard to cognitive, emotional and social functioning as well as cervical cancer-specific symptoms, no significant differences between the therapy groups were found.
Conclusion: The findings presented in this study suggest a superiority of TMMR in comparison to the previously employed radical hysterectomy according to Wertheim-Meigs with regard to the postoperative quality of life, especially in the fields of physical activity and fatigue. This needs to be validated in the course of prospective, multicentre studies. In addition, it must be clarified as to what extent the found effects are, in particular, due to the omission of an additional radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer; cervix; gynaecology

Year:  2014        PMID: 25100882      PMCID: PMC4119106          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  42 in total

1.  Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Shingo Fujii; Kenji Takakura; Noriomi Matsumura; Toshihiro Higuchi; Shigeo Yura; Masaki Mandai; Tsukasa Baba; Shinya Yoshioka
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Polat Dursun; Ali Ayhan; Esra Kuscu
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Analysis of the complications after radical hysterectomy for stage IB, IIA and IIB uterine cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Katsunori Kashima; Tetsuro Yahata; Kazuyuki Fujita; Kenichi Tanaka
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Life after radiotherapy: the psychological and social effects experienced by women treated for advanced stages of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Klee; I Thranov; D Machin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Early-stage cervical cancer: is surgery better than radiotherapy?

Authors:  Manuela Undurraga; Pierre Loubeyre; Jean-Bernard Dubuisson; Dominique Schneider; Patrick Petignat
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.512

6.  Effect of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy on bladder function recovery and quality of life in patients with cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Jiahan Wu; Xishi Liu; Keqin Hua; Changdong Hu; Xiaojun Chen; Xin Lu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Use of Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer - Results of a 2012 Germany-wide Survey.

Authors:  I Juhasz-Böss; P Mallmann; C P Möller; E F Solomayer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Health-related quality of life in cervical cancer survivors: a population-based survey.

Authors:  Ida J Korfage; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Floortje Mols; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Roy Kruitwagen; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Interdisciplinary S2k guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthias W Beckmann; Peter Mallmann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  Multi-dimensional quality of life among long-term (5+ years) adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Joan R Bloom; Dana M Petersen; Soo H Kang
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cervical cancer survivorship: long-term quality of life and social support.

Authors:  Krista S Pfaendler; Lari Wenzel; Mindy B Mechanic; Kristine R Penner
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  Total mesometrial resection (TMMR) for cervical cancer FIGO IB-IIA: first results from the multicentric TMMR register study.

Authors:  Paul Buderath; Maciej Stukan; Wencke Ruhwedel; Deivis Strutas; Gabriele Feisel-Schwickardi; Pauline Wimberger; Rainer Kimmig
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Sexual, bladder and bowel function following different minimally invasive techniques of radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  K Baessler; S Windemut; V Chiantera; C Köhler; J Sehouli
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.405

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.