Literature DB >> 20606067

Unpredictable effects of rifampin as an adjunctive agent in elimination of rifampin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains grown in biofilms.

Sander Croes1, Patrick S Beisser, Cees Neef, Cathrien A Bruggeman, Ellen E Stobberingh.   

Abstract

The use of rifampin as an adjunct in biofilm-associated infections is based on the ability to penetrate into biofilms and a presumed activity against dormant bacteria. Yet, its efficacy remains contradictory, and rifampin-resistant strains frequently emerge during therapy. Therefore, the efficacy against rifampin-susceptible and isogenic rifampin-resistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strains was evaluated. Biofilms were generated under static conditions using MSSA with various genetic backgrounds. Oxacillin alone or with rifampin at various concentrations was subsequently added, and after 24 h biomass and viable cell counts were determined. Upon rifampin addition, interstrain variations in viable count change, ranging from a tendency toward antagonism to synergy, were observed among all strains tested, irrespective of the genetic background of the strain. Similar variations were observed in changes in biomass. The decrease in viable count upon rifampin addition was negatively correlated to formation of large amounts of biomass, since strains embedded by more biomass showed a diminished reduction in viable count. Rifampin (1 microg/ml) as adjunct to oxacillin achieved greater reductions in biomass produced by most rifampin-susceptible isolates, ranging from 17 to 54%, compared to 4% for oxacillin alone. In contrast, rifampin had no additional value in reduction of biomass of isogenic rifampin-resistant mutants. At subinhibitory concentrations of rifampin (0.008 microg/ml), none of the strains tested yielded an extra reduction in biomass that was > or = 40%. In conclusion, the effects of rifampin as adjunct on biomass and viable count were unpredictable, and the use of rifampin against biofilm containing rifampin-resistant strains seems unwarranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20606067      PMCID: PMC2934976          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01811-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  36 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants.

Authors:  Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Classifying spa types in complexes improves interpretation of typing results for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Werner Ruppitsch; Alexander Indra; Anna Stöger; Barbara Mayer; Silke Stadlbauer; Günther Wewalka; Franz Allerberger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Reconsideration of rifampin: a unique drug for a unique infection.

Authors:  D M Zavasky; M A Sande
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Assignment of Staphylococcus isolates to groups by spa typing, SmaI macrorestriction analysis, and multilocus sequence typing.

Authors:  B Strommenger; C Kettlitz; T Weniger; D Harmsen; A W Friedrich; W Witte
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Lucas R Hoffman; David A D'Argenio; Michael J MacCoss; Zhaoying Zhang; Roger A Jones; Samuel I Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Penetration of rifampin through Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

Authors:  Zhilan Zheng; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Diffusion of rifampin and vancomycin through a Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm.

Authors:  W M Dunne; E O Mason; S L Kaplan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oxacillin combined with rifampin in the treatment of staphylococcal infections.

Authors:  P Van der Auwera; J Klastersky; J P Thys; F Meunier-Carpentier; J C Legrand
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  The teicoplanin-associated locus regulator (TcaR) and the intercellular adhesin locus regulator (IcaR) are transcriptional inhibitors of the ica locus in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kimberly K Jefferson; Danielle B Pier; Donald A Goldmann; Gerald B Pier
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M C Enright; N P Day; C E Davies; S J Peacock; B G Spratt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Staphylococcal Biofilms.

Authors:  Michael Otto
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2018-08

2.  Bactericidal activity of ACH-702 against nondividing and biofilm Staphylococci.

Authors:  Steven D Podos; Jane A Thanassi; Melissa Leggio; Michael J Pucci
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The Use of Vacuum Dressings for Dead Space Management in Deep Surgical Site Infections Allows Implant and Bone Graft Retention.

Authors:  James P Watt; Robert N Dunn
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-07-28

4.  Combinatory antibiotic therapy increases rate of bacterial kill but not final outcome in a novel mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus spinal implant infection.

Authors:  Yan Hu; Vishal Hegde; Daniel Johansen; Amanda H Loftin; Erik Dworsky; Stephen D Zoller; Howard Y Park; Christopher D Hamad; George E Nelson; Kevin P Francis; Anthony Scaduto; Nicholas M Bernthal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Minocycline and Fluconazole Have a Synergistic Effect Against Cryptococcus neoformans Both in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Qinxiang Kong; Zubai Cao; Na Lv; Hui Zhang; Yanyan Liu; Lifen Hu; Jiabin Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Evaluation of Staphylococcal Bacteriophage Sb-1 as an Adjunctive Agent to Antibiotics Against Rifampin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Tamta Tkhilaishvili; Andrej Trampuz; Mercedes Gonzalez Moreno
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Real time monitoring of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm sensitivity towards antibiotics with isothermal microcalorimetry.

Authors:  Andi Rofian Sultan; Mehri Tavakol; Nicole A Lemmens-den Toom; Peter D Croughs; Nelianne J Verkaik; Annelies Verbon; Willem J B van Wamel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.