Literature DB >> 22547614

Bactericidal activity of ACH-702 against nondividing and biofilm Staphylococci.

Steven D Podos1, Jane A Thanassi, Melissa Leggio, Michael J Pucci.   

Abstract

Many bacterial infections involve slow or nondividing bacterial growth states and localized high cell densities. Antibiotics with demonstrated bactericidal activity rarely remain bactericidal at therapeutic concentrations under these conditions. The isothiazoloquinolone (ITQ) ACH-702 is a potent, bactericidal compound with activity against many antibiotic-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We evaluated its bactericidal activity under conditions where bacterial cells were not dividing and/or had slowed their growth. Against S. aureus cultures in stationary phase, ACH-702 showed concentration-dependent bactericidal activity and achieved a 3-log-unit reduction in viable cell counts within 6 h of treatment at ≥ 16× MIC values; in comparison, the bactericidal quinolone moxifloxacin and the additional comparator compounds vancomycin, linezolid, and rifampin at 16× to 32× MICs showed little or no bactericidal activity against stationary-phase cells. ACH-702 at 32× MIC retained bactericidal activity against stationary-phase S. aureus across a range of inoculum densities. ACH-702 did not kill cold-arrested cells yet remained bactericidal against cells arrested by protein synthesis inhibitors, suggesting that its bactericidal activity against nondividing cells requires active metabolism but not de novo protein synthesis. ACH-702 also showed a degree of bactericidal activity at 16× MIC against S. epidermidis biofilm cells that was superior to that of moxifloxacin, rifampin, and vancomycin. The bactericidal activity of ACH-702 against stationary-phase staphylococci and biofilms suggests potential clinical utility in infections containing cells in these physiological states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22547614      PMCID: PMC3393456          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00092-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  41 in total

1.  Bactericidal effects of antibiotics on slowly growing and nongrowing bacteria.

Authors:  R H Eng; F T Padberg; S M Smith; E N Tan; C E Cherubin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Decreased susceptibility to antibiotic killing of a stable small colony variant of Staphylococcus aureus in fluid phase and on fibronectin-coated surfaces.

Authors:  C Chuard; P E Vaudaux; R A Proctor; D P Lew
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Phenotypic variation of Staphylococcus epidermidis slime production in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  G D Christensen; L M Baddour; W A Simpson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Nalidixic acid: an antibacterial paradox.

Authors:  G C Crumplin; J T Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Cell density control of staphylococcal virulence mediated by an octapeptide pheromone.

Authors:  G Ji; R C Beavis; R P Novick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The concentration-independent effect of monoexponential and biexponential decay in vancomycin concentrations on the killing of Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  A J Larsson; K J Walker; J K Raddatz; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Fluoroquinolone resistance among Gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  David C Hooper
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 25.071

8.  In vitro pharmacodynamic effects of concentration, pH, and growth phase on serum bactericidal activities of daptomycin and vancomycin.

Authors:  K C Lamp; M J Rybak; E M Bailey; G W Kaatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Evaluation of the in vitro bactericidal action of ciprofloxacin on cells of Escherichia coli in the logarithmic and stationary phases of growth.

Authors:  H J Zeiler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Activity of and resistance to moxifloxacin in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Dilek Ince; Xiamei Zhang; David C Hooper
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  7 in total

1.  Natural products as inspiration for the development of bacterial antibiofilm agents.

Authors:  Roberta J Melander; Akash K Basak; Christian Melander
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 13.423

2.  Characterizing the transcriptional adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus to stationary phase growth.

Authors:  Andy Weiss; William H Broach; Lindsey N Shaw
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 3.166

3.  Antimicrobial Tolerance in Biofilms.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-06

4.  Sigma S-dependent antioxidant defense protects stationary-phase Escherichia coli against the bactericidal antibiotic gentamicin.

Authors:  Jing-Hung Wang; Rachna Singh; Michael Benoit; Mimi Keyhan; Matthew Sylvester; Michael Hsieh; Anuradha Thathireddy; Yi-Ju Hsieh; A C Matin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  New antibiotic agents in the pipeline and how they can help overcome microbial resistance.

Authors:  Ian M Gould; Abhijit M Bal
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 5.882

6.  Prospects for Anti-Biofilm Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-27

7.  Novel Miniature Membrane Active Lipopeptidomimetics against Planktonic and Biofilm Embedded Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Seema Joshi; Sana Mumtaz; Jyotsna Singh; Santosh Pasha; Kasturi Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.