Literature DB >> 20604850

Applying the science of learning to medical education.

Richard E Mayer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The goal of this paper is to examine how to apply the science of learning to medical education. SCIENCE OF LEARNING The science of learning is the scientific study of how people learn. Multimedia learning - learning from words and pictures - is particularly relevant to medical education. The cognitive theory of multimedia learning is an information-processing explanation of how people learn from words and pictures. It is based on the idea that people have separate channels for processing words and pictures, that the capacity to process information in working memory is limited, and that meaningful learning requires appropriate cognitive processing during learning. SCIENCE OF INSTRUCTION The science of instruction is the scientific study of how to help people learn. Three important instructional goals are: to reduce extraneous processing (cognitive processing that does not serve an instructional objective) during learning; to manage essential processing (cognitive processing aimed at representing the essential material in working memory) during learning, and to foster generative processing (cognitive processing aimed at making sense of the material) during learning. Nine evidence-based principles for accomplishing these goals are presented. CONCLUSIONS Applying the science of learning to medical education can be a fruitful venture that improves medical instruction and cognitive theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20604850     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03624.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  86 in total

1.  Increasing medical students' engagement in public health: case studies illustrating the potential role of online learning.

Authors:  J Sheringham; A Lyon; A Jones; J Strobl; H Barratt
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.341

Review 2.  Educational Tools: Thinking Outside the Box.

Authors:  Majka Woods; Mark E Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Resuscitate Your Dying Lectures! Applying Evidence-based Principles to Improve Slide Design.

Authors:  Carolyn Commissaris; Bella Nagappan; Daniel Cronin; Sarah H Michael; Chris Merritt; Michelle Daniel
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-02-03

4.  Seeing Wisely.

Authors:  Daniel J Wheeler; Kip Mihara; Joe Chiovaro
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Videoconferencing: A Steep Learning Curve for Medical Educators.

Authors:  Andrea Smeraglio; Matthew DiVeronica; Christopher Terndrup; Bryn McGhee; Shona Hunsaker
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-10

6.  From Scope to Screen: The Evolution of Histology Education.

Authors:  Jamie A Chapman; Lisa M J Lee; Nathan T Swailes
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 7.  What Does the Future Hold for Scientific Journals? Visual Abstracts and Other Tools for Communicating Research.

Authors:  Vahagn C Nikolian; Andrew M Ibrahim
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

8.  Optimizing educational video through comparative trials in clinical environments.

Authors:  Ian David Aronson; Jan L Plass; Theodore C Bania
Journal:  Educ Technol Res Dev       Date:  2012-01-12

Review 9.  Practice and Educational Gaps in Lupus, Dermatomyositis, and Morphea.

Authors:  Nicole M Fett; David Fiorentino; Victoria P Werth
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.478

10.  Effect of improving the usability of an e-learning resource: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Mogamat Razeen Davids; Usuf M E Chikte; Mitchell L Halperin
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.