SCOPE: There are differences in stability to pepsin between the major allergens in peanut; however, data are from different reports using different digestion models. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of the digestibility of the major peanut allergens. METHODS AND RESULTS: Peanut allergens Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6 were incubated with pepsin to mimic the effect of gastric digestion. Samples were analyzed using SDS-PAGE. To further investigate resistance to digestion, Ara h 2 was additionally subjected to digestion with trypsin and residual peptides were characterized. Ara h 1 and Ara h 3 were rapidly hydrolyzed by pepsin. On the contrary, Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were resistant to pepsin digestion, even at very high concentrations of pepsin. In fact, limited proteolysis could only be demonstrated by SDS-PAGE performed under reducing conditions, indicating an important role for the disulfide bridges in maintaining the quaternary structure of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6. Trypsin digestion of Ara h 2 similarly resulted in large residual peptides and these were identified. CONCLUSION: Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 are considerably more stable towards digestion than Ara h 1 and Ara h 3.
SCOPE: There are differences in stability to pepsin between the major allergens in peanut; however, data are from different reports using different digestion models. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of the digestibility of the major peanut allergens. METHODS AND RESULTS:Peanut allergens Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6 were incubated with pepsin to mimic the effect of gastric digestion. Samples were analyzed using SDS-PAGE. To further investigate resistance to digestion, Ara h 2 was additionally subjected to digestion with trypsin and residual peptides were characterized. Ara h 1 and Ara h 3 were rapidly hydrolyzed by pepsin. On the contrary, Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were resistant to pepsin digestion, even at very high concentrations of pepsin. In fact, limited proteolysis could only be demonstrated by SDS-PAGE performed under reducing conditions, indicating an important role for the disulfide bridges in maintaining the quaternary structure of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6. Trypsin digestion of Ara h 2 similarly resulted in large residual peptides and these were identified. CONCLUSION: Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 are considerably more stable towards digestion than Ara h 1 and Ara h 3.
Authors: M Kulis; X Chen; J Lew; Q Wang; O P Patel; Y Zhuang; K S Murray; M W Duncan; H S Porterfield; A W Burks; S C Dreskin Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Maksymilian Chruszcz; Soheila J Maleki; Karolina A Majorek; Matthew Demas; Merima Bublin; Robert Solberg; Barry K Hurlburt; Sanbao Ruan; Christopher P Mattison; Christopher P Mattisohn; Heimo Breiteneder; Wladek Minor Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Audrey E Koid; Martin D Chapman; Robert G Hamilton; Ronald van Ree; Serge A Versteeg; Stephen C Dreskin; Stef J Koppelman; Sabina Wünschmann Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2013-12-26 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Sandra Andorf; Magnus P Borres; Whitney Block; Dana Tupa; Jennifer B Bollyky; Vanitha Sampath; Arnon Elizur; Jonas Lidholm; Joseph E Jones; Stephen J Galli; Rebecca S Chinthrajah; Kari C Nadeau Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2017-03-27
Authors: Louise Rundqvist; Tobias Tengel; Janusz Zdunek; Erik Björn; Jürgen Schleucher; Marcos J C Alcocer; Göran Larsson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Stephen C Dreskin; Stef J Koppelman; Sandra Andorf; Kari C Nadeau; Anjeli Kalra; Werner Braun; Surendra S Negi; Xueni Chen; Catherine H Schein Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 10.793