BACKGROUND: For people with disabilities, a physically active lifestyle can reduce the risk of secondary health problems and improve overall functioning. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of the sport stimulation programme "rehabilitation and sports" (R&S) and R&S combined with the daily physical activity promotion programme "active after rehabilitation" (AaR) on sport participation and daily physical activity behaviour nine weeks after inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation. METHODS:Subjects in four intervention rehabilitation centres were randomised to a group receiving R&S only (n = 315) or a group receiving R&S and AaR (n = 284). Subjects in six control rehabilitation centres (n = 603) received theusual care. Most common diagnoses were stroke, neurological disorders, and back disorders. Two sport and two daily physical activity outcomes were assessed with questionnaires seven weeks before and nine weeks after the end of rehabilitation. Data were analysed by intention to treat and on treatment multilevel analyses, comparing both intervention groups with the control group. RESULTS: The R&S group showed no significant change. Intention to treat analyses of the R&S+AaR group showed significant improvements in one sport (p = 0.02) and one physical activity outcome (p = 0.03). On treatment analyses in the R&S+AaR group showed significant improvements in both sport outcomes (p<0.01 and p = 0.02) and one physical activity outcome (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Only the combination of R&S and AaR had increased sports participation and daily physical activity behaviour nine weeks after the end of inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: For people with disabilities, a physically active lifestyle can reduce the risk of secondary health problems and improve overall functioning. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of the sport stimulation programme "rehabilitation and sports" (R&S) and R&S combined with the daily physical activity promotion programme "active after rehabilitation" (AaR) on sport participation and daily physical activity behaviour nine weeks after inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: Subjects in four intervention rehabilitation centres were randomised to a group receiving R&S only (n = 315) or a group receiving R&S and AaR (n = 284). Subjects in six control rehabilitation centres (n = 603) received the usual care. Most common diagnoses were stroke, neurological disorders, and back disorders. Two sport and two daily physical activity outcomes were assessed with questionnaires seven weeks before and nine weeks after the end of rehabilitation. Data were analysed by intention to treat and on treatment multilevel analyses, comparing both intervention groups with the control group. RESULTS: The R&S group showed no significant change. Intention to treat analyses of the R&S+AaR group showed significant improvements in one sport (p = 0.02) and one physical activity outcome (p = 0.03). On treatment analyses in the R&S+AaR group showed significant improvements in both sport outcomes (p<0.01 and p = 0.02) and one physical activity outcome (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Only the combination of R&S and AaR had increased sports participation and daily physical activity behaviour nine weeks after the end of inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation.
Authors: Adrienne R Hughes; Fiona Gillies; Alison F Kirk; Nanette Mutrie; William S Hillis; Paul D MacIntyre Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: R A Cooper; L A Quatrano; P W Axelson; W Harlan; M Stineman; B Franklin; J S Krause; J Bach; H Chambers; E Y Chao; M Alexander; P Painter Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 1999-04
Authors: Richard A Washburn; Weimo Zhu; Edward McAuley; Michael Frogley; Stephen F Figoni Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Chiara Di Loreto; Carmine Fanelli; Paola Lucidi; Giuseppe Murdolo; Arianna De Cicco; Natascia Parlanti; Fausto Santeusanio; Paolo Brunetti; Pierpaolo De Feo Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Hanna van Waart; Johanna M van Dongen; Wim H van Harten; Martijn M Stuiver; Rosalie Huijsmans; Jeannette A J H Hellendoorn-van Vreeswijk; Gabe S Sonke; Neil K Aaronson Journal: Eur J Health Econ Date: 2017-10-30
Authors: Hidde P van der Ploeg; Kitty R M Streppel; Allard J van der Beek; Luc H V van der Woude; Wim H van Harten; Willem van Mechelen Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2008
Authors: Hanna van Waart; Martijn M Stuiver; Wim H van Harten; Edwin Geleijn; Marianne de Maaker-Berkhof; Jolanda Schrama; Maud M Geenen; Jetske M Meerum Terwogt; Simone M van den Heiligenberg; Jeannette A J H Hellendoorn-van Vreeswijk; Gabe S Sonke; Neil K Aaronson Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Marilyn MacKay-Lyons; Sandra A Billinger; Janice J Eng; Alex Dromerick; Nicholas Giacomantonio; Charlene Hafer-Macko; Richard Macko; Emily Nguyen; Peter Prior; Neville Suskin; Ada Tang; Marianne Thornton; Karen Unsworth Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2020-01-23
Authors: Jorrit Slaman; Marij E Roebroeck; Jetty van Meeteren; Wilma M van der Slot; Heleen A Reinders-Messelink; Eline Lindeman; Henk J Stam; Rita J van den Berg-Emons Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 2.125