Literature DB >> 20595927

Clinical accuracy of computer-assisted two-dimensional fluoroscopy for the percutaneous placement of lumbosacral pedicle screws.

Bheeshma Ravi1, Ali Zahrai, Raja Rampersaud.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical case series.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of computer-assisted two-dimensional fluoroscopy (2D-CAS) for the percutaneous placement of lumbosacral pedicle screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Loss of visual anatomic landmarks and reduced tactile feedback increases the risk of pedicle screw misplacement by when using minimally invasive (MIS) percutaneous techniques. However, objective data on screw misplacement in this scenario is lacking.
METHODS: A MIS-2D-CAS technique (FluoroNav) was used for the placement of pedicle screws in 41 consecutive patients undergoing MIS-interbody instrumented fusion. Postoperative computerized tomography (CT) was obtained in all patients at 6 months after surgery and was evaluated by 3 observers. The relative position of the screw to the pedicle was graded regarding pedicle breach (I, no breach; II, <2 mm; III, 2-4 mm; IV, >4 mm), breach direction, vertebral body perforation and screw trajectory. Interobserver reliability of CT grading was assessed with kappa statistics.
RESULTS: A total of 161 screws were placed. No neurologic, vascular, or visceral injuries occurred. About 37 (23%) screws breached the pedicle. The majority (83.8%, 31/37) of breaches were graded II. There were 5 Grade III and 1 Grade IV breaches. Medial versus lateral breaches occurred in 30% (11/37) and 60% (22/37), respectively; 10% (4/37) of the breaches were superior. Overall, 8 (5%) vertebral body breaches occurred. Of the pedicle screws, 19 (12%) had trajectories that deviated from acceptable, with the majority being medial (16/19, 84%). Fluoroscopy time for screw placement was typically less than 20 seconds total per case. There was 1 clinically significant breach at L5 (III, medial) which resulted in a L5 radiculopathy. Kappa statistics showed excellent overall agreement between reviewers (k = 0.73-0.92; 90%-96% agreement).
CONCLUSION: The two-dimensional (2D) virtual fluoroscopy is a clinically acceptable option for percutaneous placement of pedicle screws. However, this technique requires cautious application and is particularly vulnerable to axial trajectory errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20595927     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cbfd09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  Fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw accuracy with a mini-open approach: a tomographic evaluation of 470 screws in 125 patients.

Authors:  José Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Luis Alberto Ortega-Porcayo; Carlos Francisco Gutiérrez-Partida; Luis Rodolfo Ramírez-Barrios; Ramses Uriel Ortíz-Leyva; Manuel Rodríguez-García; Oscar Sánchez-Escandón
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-10-23

2.  Monitoring reduced scattering coefficient in pedicle screw insertion trajectory using near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Weitao Li; Yangyang Liu; Haixiang Sun; Yue Pan; Zhiyu Qian
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Accuracy of thoracolumbar transpedicular and vertebral body percutaneous screw placement: coupling the Rosa® Spine robot with intraoperative flat-panel CT guidance--a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Lefranc; J Peltier
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-22

Review 4.  The evolution of image-guided lumbosacral spine surgery.

Authors:  Austin C Bourgeois; Austin R Faulkner; Alexander S Pasciak; Yong C Bradley
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-04

Review 5.  An endoscopic surgical technique for treating radiculopathy secondary to S1 nerve compression from a pedicle screw: technical note.

Authors:  Ralf Wagner; Albert E Telfeian
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

Review 6.  Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed A Aoude; Maryse Fortin; Rainer Figueiredo; Peter Jarzem; Jean Ouellet; Michael H Weber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Percutaneous screw placement in the lumbar spine with a modified guidance technique based on 3D CT navigation system.

Authors:  Ioannis D Siasios; John Pollina; Asham Khan; Vassilios George Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

8.  Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lianlei Wang; Chao Li; Zheng Wang; Donglai Li; Yonghao Tian; Suomao Yuan; Xinyu Liu
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-07-05

9.  Minimal access bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  N A Quraishi; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Radiation Exposure in Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of CT Image-Guided Navigation, Robotic Assistance, and Intraoperative Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Erik Wang; Jordan Manning; Christopher G Varlotta; Dainn Woo; Ethan Ayres; Edem Abotsi; Dennis Vasquez-Montes; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Jeffrey A Goldstein; Anthony K Frempong-Boadu; Peter G Passias; Aaron J Buckland
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.