Literature DB >> 23361530

Minimal access bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

N A Quraishi1, Y Raja Rampersaud.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive or "minimal access surgery" (MAS) is being utilized with increasing frequency to reduce approach-related morbidity in the lumbar spine. This paper describes our minimal access technique for posterior bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and spinal instrumentation in a patient with high-grade spondylolisthesis grade (Myerding Grade III) with 5-year follow-up.
METHODS: A 24-year-old lady presented with mechanical back pain and left leg L5 radiculopathy. On examination, she was a thin lady with an obvious step deformity in the lower lumbar spine and otherwise, a normal neurological examination. Imaging showed a grade III isthmic L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with foraminal stenosis and focal kyphotic alignment of 20° [slip angle (SA) = 70°]. Conservative measures had failed, and a decision was made to proceed with a MAS-TLIF approach.
RESULTS: The estimated blood loss was less than 100 ml, operating time 150 min, and post-operative hospital stay was 4 days. Post-operatively the patient had significant improvement of back and radicular pain. Improvement in ODI was substantial and sustained at 5 years. A solid fusion was achieved at 8 months. The slip percentage improved from 68 % (pre-op) to 28 % (post-op) and the focal alignment to 20° lordosis (SA = 110°).
CONCLUSIONS: A MAS approach for selected patients with a mobile high-grade spondylolisthesis is feasible, safe and clinically effective, with the added benefit of reduced soft-tissue disruption. Our result of this technique suggests that the ability to correct focal deformity, and achieve excellent radiographic and clinical outcome is similar to the open procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23361530      PMCID: PMC3731488          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2623-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation techniques in a calf spine model.

Authors:  Nathan H Lebwohl; Bryan W Cunningham; Anton Dmitriev; Norimichi Shimamoto; Lee Gooch; Vince Devlin; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Theodore A Wagner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Correlation of pelvic incidence with low- and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Darrell S Hanson; Keith H Bridwell; John M Rhee; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The iliac buttress. A computed tomographic study of sacral anatomy.

Authors:  R P Jackson; A C McManus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.

Authors:  James D Schwender; Langston T Holly; David P Rouben; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

5.  Significantly improved outcomes with a less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion incorporating total facetectomy.

Authors:  Ata G Kasis; Laurence A G Marshman; Manoj Krishna; Chandra K Bhatia
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Anne G Copay; Sigurd H Berven; David W Polly; Brian R Subach; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction.

Authors:  Takahiro Tsutsumimoto; Mitsuhiko Shimogata; Hiroshi Ohta; Hiromichi Misawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Chan Wearn Benedict Peng; Wai Mun Yue; Seng Yew Poh; William Yeo; Seang Beng Tan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Radiographic markers in spondyloptosis: implications for spondylolisthesis progression.

Authors:  Lukasz J Curylo; Charles Edwards; Ronald W DeWald
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Radiographic and clinical outcomes after instrumented reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of mid and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Nitin Goyal; David W Wimberley; Adam Hyatt; Steve Zeiller; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; Todd J Albert
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Minimal access bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis" (by Nasir A. Quraishi and Y. Raja Rampersaud; doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2623-2).

Authors:  Christof Birkenmaier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Is a drain tube necessary for minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion surgery?

Authors:  Pei-I Hung; Ming-Chau Chang; Po-Hsin Chou; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Bilateral tubular minimally invasive surgery for low-dysplastic lumbosacral lytic spondylolisthesis (LDLLS): analysis of a series focusing on postoperative sagittal balance and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Mario Piccini; Abdulrazzaq Alobaid; Abdulaziz Al-Mutair; Vincenzo Albanese; Francesco Certo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single segmental lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimum two-year follow up.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Zhi-Chao Hu; Xiao-Bin Li; Zhen-Hua Feng; Dong Chen; Hui Xu; Qi-Shan Huang; Yan Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang; Kai Zhang; Jie Zhao; Wen-Fei Ni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

5.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Grade I Versus Grade II Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Benjamin C Mayo; William W Long; Krishna D Modi; Gregory D Lopez; Grant D Shifflett; Bryce A Basques; Philip K Louie; Daniel D Bohl; Fady Y Hijji; Ankur S Narain; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

6.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Isthmic Versus Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Benjamin C Mayo; Grant D Shifflett; Daniel D Bohl; Philip K Louie; Bryce A Basques; William W Long; Krishna D Modi; Fady Y Hijji; Ankur S Narain; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 7.  The Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Posterior Approach Spinal Fusion in Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: The Current Evidence from Prospective Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Chun-Hui Chen; Zhi-Hao Shen; Zhen-Hua Feng; Wan-Qing Weng; Shu-Min Li; Yong-Long Chi; Li-Hui Yin; Wen-Fei Ni
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis using long arm screw: A literature review.

Authors:  Ifran Saleh; Didik Librianto
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-12-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.