Literature DB >> 20595569

Clinical, radiographic, and ultrasonographic comparison of subscapularis tenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy for total shoulder arthroplasty.

Jason J Scalise1, James Ciccone, Joseph P Iannotti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, a lesser tuberosity osteotomy has been promoted as an alternative to tenotomy for release of the subscapularis during shoulder arthroplasty. To our knowledge, no direct comparison of the clinical results of the two techniques has been presented.
METHODS: Thirty-five shoulders in thirty-four consecutive patients with osteoarthritis who had a primary total shoulder arthroplasty, performed with use of a standard subscapularis tenotomy (Group 1) or lesser tuberosity osteotomy (Group 2) to release the subscapularis, were evaluated retrospectively at an average of thirty-three months. Group 1 consisted of fifteen shoulders in fourteen patients (seven in males and eight in females, with an average age of sixty-seven years). Group 2 consisted of twenty shoulders in twenty patients (fourteen males and six females, with an average age of sixty-nine years). Assessment included a physical examination, clinical outcome questionnaires, conventional radiography, ultrasound examination of the subscapularis, and measurement of internal rotation strength.
RESULTS: The postoperative total Penn Shoulder Scores improved significantly from the preoperative levels in both groups (mean and standard deviation, 29 +/- 15 points to 81 +/- 20 points [p < 0.00001] in Group 1 and 29 +/- 16 points to 92 +/- 11 points [p < 0.00001] in Group 2). However, the postoperative mean total Penn Shoulder Score was higher in Group 2 (92 +/- 11 points) than in Group 1 (81 +/- 20 points) (p = 0.04). At one year, an abnormal subscapularis on ultrasound was associated with a lower mean Penn Shoulder Score in Group 1 (73 +/- 19 points compared with 92 +/- 3 points; p = 0.01). However, at a minimum two-year follow-up, this difference was not significant (mean, 74 +/- 24 points and 86 +/- 15 points, respectively; p = 0.25). There were more abnormal subscapularis tendons in Group 1 (six attenuated tendons and one full-thickness tear) than in Group 2 (two attenuated tendons). Internal rotation strength did not differ between the groups when controlled for sex (mean, 117 +/- 8 N and 127 +/- 21 N for males in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively [p = 0.22] and 77 +/- 27 N and 101 +/- 26 N, respectively, for females [p = 0.1]).
CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques resulted in improved clinical outcome scores. The lesser tuberosity osteotomy resulted in higher clinical outcome scores, a lower rate of subscapularis tendon tears, and universal healing of the osteotomy. This technique offers a means by which the rate of postoperative subscapularis tears may be reduced in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20595569     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  15 in total

1.  Subscapularis release in shoulder replacement determines structural muscular changes.

Authors:  Lieven Franciscus De Wilde; Tineke De Coninck; Francis De Neve; Bart M Berghs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Survival rate and complications of stemmed shoulder prostheses in primary osteoarthritis].

Authors:  U Irlenbusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Shoulder arthroplasty using mini-stem humeral components and a lesser tuberosity osteotomy.

Authors:  E M Guerrero; M P Morwood; R A Kankaria; P S Johnston; G E Garrigues
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  [Surgical approach to the shoulder. Lesser tuberosity osteotomy].

Authors:  T Patzer; C Ziskoven; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Deltopectoral approach for shoulder arthroplasty: anatomic basis.

Authors:  Francois Gadea; Yves Bouju; Julien Berhouet; Guillaume Bacle; Luc Favard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists' consensus statement on rehabilitation for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  June S Kennedy; Grant E Garrigues; Federico Pozzi; Matthew J Zens; Bryce Gaunt; Brian Phillips; Ashim Bakshi; Angela R Tate
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Healing Rate and Clinical Outcomes of Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy for Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nick R Johnson; David P Trofa; Bryan M Saltzman; Katherine R Muña; Shadley C Schiffern; Nady Hamid
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-02-10

8.  Posterior Rotator Cuff-sparing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Three Cases.

Authors:  R Michael Greiwe
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2017-03-31

Review 9.  Rotator cuff tears after total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis: A systematic review.

Authors:  David M Levy; Geoffrey D Abrams; Joshua D Harris; Bernard R Bach; Gregory P Nicholson; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  A Tensionable Method for Subscapularis Repair after Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Patrick J Denard; Matthew P Noyes; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.