Literature DB >> 29858837

Shoulder arthroplasty using mini-stem humeral components and a lesser tuberosity osteotomy.

E M Guerrero1, M P Morwood2, R A Kankaria3, P S Johnston3, G E Garrigues2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) and mini-stem humeral components (MSHCs) can be safely and effectively used together in total and hemi-shoulder arthroplasty (TSA/HHA).
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent anatomic TSA/HHA utilizing combined LTO/MSHC with minimum 2-year follow-up. Six-week and final radiographs, range of motion, pain scores, and selected outcome measures were assessed.
RESULTS: Seventy five shoulders with mean follow-up of 27.8 months (24-50 months) were analyzed. Sixty-seven (89.3%) shoulders had uneventful LTO healing. There were five (6.67%) LTO failures, one (1.33%) fibrous union, and two (2.67%) osteotomies that had displaced > 4 mm at 6 weeks; four of the five failures required open repair, including one converted to reverse TSA. The other failure, the fibrous union, and the two displaced osteotomies were without clinical deficits and elected for non-operative management. One patient required intraoperative conversion to a long stem due to concern that metaphyseal bone integrity was compromised, in part, by the LTO. Four (5.33%) stems subsided, with one of them also being frankly loose and requiring revision, while the other three were asymptomatic, not requiring treatment. No other stems were judged to be loose. Mean ASES, SANE, VAS, forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation all improved significantly (p < 0.001 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: LTO/MSHC use is appropriate for TSA/HHA, achieving pain relief and functional improvement. Component loosening appears uncommon at early follow-up. Long-stem components should be available in case the metaphyseal bone is compromised. When performed properly, LTO/MSHC use is a safe and effective surgical strategy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Humerus; Lesser tuberosity; Osteotomy; Shoulder; Stem

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858837     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-018-0545-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  31 in total

1.  Radiographic assessment of cemented humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Sanchez-Sotelo; S W O'Driscoll; M E Torchia; R H Cofield; C M Rowland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Comparison of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery.

Authors:  G N Williams; T J Gangel; R A Arciero; J M Uhorchak; D C Taylor
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Loss of subscapularis function after total shoulder replacement: A seldom recognized problem.

Authors:  Suzanne L Miller; Yassamin Hazrati; Steven Klepps; Alexis Chiang; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Philip W McClure; Brian J Sennett
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion.

Authors:  Mark D Lazarus; Kirk L Jensen; Carleton Southworth; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement.

Authors:  G R Williams; K L Wong; M D Pepe; V Tan; D Silverberg; M L Ramsey; A Karduna; J P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Radiographic assessment of ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  J W Sperling; R H Cofield; S W O'Driscoll; M E Torchia; C M Rowland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jochem Nagels; Mariëlle Stokdijk; Piet M Rozing
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  The measurement of normative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores.

Authors:  Peter I Sallay; Lucas Reed
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Glenoid wear after shoulder hemiarthroplasty: quantitative radiographic analysis.

Authors:  I M Parsons; Peter J Millett; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Combined with Anteroinferior Capsulectomy for Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin Kerzner; Mariano E Menendez; Nabil Mehta; Morgan L Angotti; Matthew R Cohn; Gerald R Williams; Grant E Garrigues
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-07-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.