Literature DB >> 32534209

The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists' consensus statement on rehabilitation for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

June S Kennedy1, Grant E Garrigues2, Federico Pozzi3, Matthew J Zens4, Bryce Gaunt5, Brian Phillips5, Ashim Bakshi6, Angela R Tate7.   

Abstract

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is the gold standard shoulder replacement procedure for patients with an intact rotator cuff and sufficient glenoid bone to accommodate prosthetic glenoid implant and offers reliable patient satisfaction, excellent implant longevity, and a low incidence of complications. Disparity exists in the literature regarding rehabilitation strategies following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. This article presents a consensus statement from experts in the field on rehabilitation following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. The goal of this consensus statement is to provide a current evidence-based foundation to inform the rehabilitation process after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. These guidelines apply to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (replacement of the humeral head and glenoid), hemiarthroplasty (replacing only the humeral head), and hemiarthroplasty with glenoid reaming or resurfacing. The consensus statement integrates an extensive literature review, as well as survey results of the practice patterns of members of the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. Three stages of recovery are proposed, which initially protect and then gradually load soft tissue affected by the surgical procedure, such as the subscapularis, for optimal patient outcomes. The proposed guidelines should be used in collaboration with surgeon preferences and patient-specific factors.
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder arthroplasty; exercise; physical therapy; rehabilitation; shoulder replacement; subscapularis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32534209      PMCID: PMC8262512          DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  65 in total

1.  Biomechanical similarities among subscapularis repairs after shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Van Thiel; Vincent M Wang; Fan-Chia Wang; Shane J Nho; Dana P Piasecki; Bernard R Bach; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Return to sports after shoulder arthroplasty: a survey of surgeons' preferences.

Authors:  Alexander Golant; Dimitrios Christoforou; Joseph D Zuckerman; Young W Kwon
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Healing rates and subscapularis fatty infiltration after lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis peel for exposure during shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter L C Lapner; Elham Sabri; Kawan Rakhra; Kimberly Bell; George S Athwal
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Long-term activity restrictions after shoulder arthroplasty: an international survey of experienced shoulder surgeons.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; William J Mallon; W Jaap Willems; Claude T Moorman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy: the clinical effect of deltoid lengthening and center of rotation medialization.

Authors:  Charles M Jobin; Gabriel D Brown; Maher J Bahu; Thomas R Gardner; Louis U Bigliani; William N Levine; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Histological evaluation of repair of the rotator cuff in a primate model.

Authors:  D H Sonnabend; C R Howlett; A A Young
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-04

Review 7.  Shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis: A review of surgical management.

Authors:  Jay Pandya; Tamara Johnson; Adrian K Low
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results correlated to degree of glenoid wear.

Authors:  W N Levine; M Djurasovic; J M Glasson; R G Pollock; E L Flatow; L U Bigliani
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Comparison of lesser tuberosity osteotomy to subscapularis peel in shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter L C Lapner; Elham Sabri; Kawan Rakhra; Kimberly Bell; George S Athwal
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Clinical and Biomechanical Evaluation of an All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis.

Authors:  Cynthia A Kahlenberg; Ronak M Patel; Rueben Nair; Prashant P Deshmane; Galen Harnden; Michael A Terry
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-23
View more
  1 in total

1.  Rate of improvement in shoulder strength after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin A Hao; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Jonathan O Wright; Ethan W Dean; Aimee M Struk; Joseph J King
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.