Literature DB >> 20595305

Use of health information technology in home health and hospice agencies: United States, 2007.

Helaine E Resnick1, Majd Alwan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This report provides updated estimates on use of electronic medical records (EMRs) in US home health and hospice (HHH) agencies, describes utilization of EMR functionalities, and presents novel data on telemedicine and point of care documentation (PoCD) in this setting.
DESIGN: Nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of US HHH agencies conducted in 2007. MEASUREMENTS: Data on agency characteristics, current use of EMR systems as well as use of telemedicine and PoCD were collected.
RESULTS: In 2007, 43% of US HHH agencies reported use of an EMR system. Patient demographics (40%) and clinical notes (34%) were the most commonly used EMR functions among US HHH agencies. Only 20% of agencies with EMR systems had health information sharing functionality and about half of them used it. Telemedicine was used by 21% of all HHH agencies, with most (87%) of these offering home health services. Among home health agencies using telemedicine, greater than 90% used telephone monitoring and about two-thirds used non-video monitoring. Nearly 29% of HHH agencies reported using electronic PoCD systems, most often for Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data capture (79%). Relative to for-profit HHH agencies, non-profit agencies used considerably more EMR (70% vs 28%, p<0.001) and PoCD (63% vs 9%, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Between 2000 and 2007, there was a 33% increase in use of EMR among HHH agencies in the US. In 2007, use of EMR and PoCD technologies in non-profit agencies was significantly higher than for-profit ones. Finally, HHH agencies generally tended to use available EMR functionalities, including health information sharing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20595305      PMCID: PMC2995658          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  1 in total

1.  Use of computerized medical records in home health and hospice agencies: United States, 2000.

Authors:  William S Pearson; Anita R Bercovitz
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 13       Date:  2006-06
  1 in total
  11 in total

1.  Identifying certification criteria for home care EHR Meaningful Use.

Authors:  Paulina S Sockolow; Marguerite C Adelsberger; Kathryn H Bowles
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

2.  Impact of homecare electronic health record on timeliness of clinical documentation, reimbursement, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  P S Sockolow; K H Bowles; M C Adelsberger; J L Chittams; C Liao
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Health Care Reform and Concurrent Curative Care for Terminally Ill Children: A Policy Analysis.

Authors:  Lisa C Lindley
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.918

4.  Facility characteristics associated with the use of electronic health records in residential care facilities.

Authors:  Amanda A Holup; Debra Dobbs; Hongdao Meng; Kathryn Hyer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Misalignment between medicare policies and depression care in home health care: home health provider perspectives.

Authors:  Yuhua Bao; Ashley A Eggman; Joshua E Richardson; Martha L Bruce
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Use of electronic documentation for quality improvement in hospice.

Authors:  John G Cagle; Franziska S Rokoske; Danielle Durham; Anna P Schenck; Carol Spence; Laura C Hanson
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Implementation of Electronic Health Records in US Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir; Carolyn T A Herzig; Jasmine L Travers; Nicholas G Castle; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Challenges and facilitators to adoption of a point-of-care electronic health record in home care.

Authors:  Paulina S Sockolow; Kathryn H Bowles; Marguerite C Adelsberger; Jesse L Chittams; Cindy Liao
Journal:  Home Health Care Serv Q       Date:  2014

9.  Advice for Decision Makers Based on an Electronic Health Record Evaluation at a Program for All-inclusive Care for Elders Site.

Authors:  P S Sockolow; J P Weiner; K H Bowles; P Abbott; H P Lehmann
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.342

10.  Technology Solutions to Support Care Continuity in Home Care: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Dawn W Dowding; David Russell; Nicole Onorato; Jacqueline A Merrill
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 1.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.