Literature DB >> 20594526

PC-Based 3D Reconstruction of MR Angiography in Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms. The Value of Pre-Treatment Planning for Embolization and Post-Treatment Follow-up.

S W Park1, M H Han, S H Cha, B J Kwon, K H Kim, O K Kwon, S K Baik, K H Chang.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: In this study, we present our experiences of personal computer-based 3D reconstructions of MRA for pre-treatment planning and post-treatment follow-up for cerebral aneurysms. Twentynine ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysm patients with 36 intracranial aneurysms, who underwent embolization and pretreatment and/or follow up 3D MRA were included in this study. All 29 patients were examined by DSA and MRA before (18 patients, 24 aneurysms) and/or after embolization (16 patients, 17 aneurysms). The MRA source images were transported to a personal computer in DICOM format for viewing, post-processing, and 3D reconstruction. DSA and PC based SSD 3D MRA equally well demonstrated most aneurysms before embolization (17 patients, 22 aneurysms). The depiction of aneurysm morphology, neck evaluation and branch vessel interpretation were much easier on 3D MRA, which has the ability to manipulate images in real time. When the vascular anatomy was complicated by another vascular system, the anterior or posterior circulations were separately reconstructed easily by using PC based reconstruction software. The 3D MRA also well demonstrated post-embolization recurrence or remnant aneurysmal cavities. In one giant aneurysm, the 3D MRA was unable to show the entire aneurysmal sac due to a blood flow saturation effect, but this was resolved by additional contrast material injection. PC-based 3D MRA proved to be a useful tool for the pretreatment planning of embolization procedures and for follow up after treatment in the case of cerebral aneurysms.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 20594526      PMCID: PMC3576610          DOI: 10.1177/159101990200800209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  23 in total

1.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings.

Authors:  Y Korogi; M Takahashi; T Nakagawa; N Mabuchi; T Watabe; Y Shiokawa; H Shiga; T O'Uchi; H Miki; Y Horikawa; S Fujiwara; M Furuse
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR angiography.

Authors:  J S Ross; T J Masaryk; M T Modic; P M Ruggieri; E M Haacke; W R Selman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  [Comparison of MRA and angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with GDC].

Authors:  R Michardière; D Bensalem; D Martin; N Baudouin; D Binnert
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.447

4.  MR angiography of intracranial aneurysms: proceed, but with caution.

Authors:  A W Litt
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms.

Authors:  H R Jäger; H Ellamushi; E A Moore; J P Grieve; N D Kitchen; W J Taylor
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Noninvasive follow-up of GDC-treated saccular aneurysms by MR angiography.

Authors:  W Weber; T A Yousry; S R Felber; H Henkes; H C Nahser; N Roer; D Kühne
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The role of MR angiography in the pretreatment assessment of intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study.

Authors:  W M Adams; R D Laitt; A Jackson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Intracranial aneurysms: MR angiographic screening in 400 asymptomatic individuals with increased familial risk.

Authors:  A Ronkainen; M I Puranen; J A Hernesniemi; R L Vanninen; P L Partanen; J T Saari; P A Vainio; M Ryynänen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Magnetic resonance angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  G Schuierer; W J Huk; G Laub
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography.

Authors:  J E Heiserman; B L Dean; J A Hodak; R A Flom; C R Bird; B P Drayer; E K Fram
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  4 in total

1.  Role of neuroradiology in evaluating cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  A Stafa; M Leonardi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Short-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with polyglycolic acid/lactide copolymer-coated coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Hyun-Seung Kang; Moon Hee Han; Bae Ju Kwon; O-Ki Kwon; Sung Hyun Kim; Seung Hong Choi; Kee-Hyun Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M J van Amerongen; H D Boogaarts; J de Vries; A L M Verbeek; F J A Meijer; M Prokop; R H M A Bartels
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  In vitro evaluation of 2D-digital subtraction angiography versus 3D-time-of-flight in assessment of intracranial cerebral aneurysm filling after endovascular therapy.

Authors:  V Costalat; E Lebars; L Sarry; A Defasque; E Barbotte; H Brunel; G Bourbotte; A Bonafé
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.