Literature DB >> 11511903

Noninvasive follow-up of GDC-treated saccular aneurysms by MR angiography.

W Weber1, T A Yousry, S R Felber, H Henkes, H C Nahser, N Roer, D Kühne.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the assessment of durable occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDC) and to point out the influence of MRA results in re-intervention strategies. Forty-five patients with 54 aneurysms that were previously treated by endovascular occlusion with GDC were selected for this study. All patients underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and MRA examinations on the same day. The time-of-flight MRA studies were performed on a 1-T scanner. The MRA images were first read by radiologists who were not aware of the DSA results. In a second consensus reading by the neuroradiologists who had performed all interventional procedures of this series, the decision was made as to whether re-treatment was necessary. The distribution of aneurysm sizes, configurations and treatment results were sufficient for an unbiased evaluation. The first blinded evaluation revealed a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 95% for MRA assessment of aneurysm reperfusion. In the second consensus reading, the sensitivity increased to 92% and the specificity was 98%. The blinded reading indicates that MRA is a useful adjunct to DSA for the assessment of durable results after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. In the consensus reading it became obvious that sensitivity and specificity of MRA can be increased to 92 and 98%, respectively, if the results were evaluated by experienced neuroradiologists, including prior knowledge of all other examinations. We have already increased the follow-up intervals for DSA and use MRA intermittently, based on these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11511903     DOI: 10.1007/s003300000741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  18 in total

1.  Role of neuroradiology in evaluating cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  A Stafa; M Leonardi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 2.  MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Robert M Kwee
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of 3D inflow MRA at 3T and 1.5T and contrast-enhanced MRA at 3T with DSA.

Authors:  Birgitta Ramgren; Roger Siemund; Mats Cronqvist; Per Undrén; Ola G Nilsson; Stig Holtås; Elna-Marie Larsson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M J van Amerongen; H D Boogaarts; J de Vries; A L M Verbeek; F J A Meijer; M Prokop; R H M A Bartels
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms.

Authors:  R C Wallace; J P Karis; S Partovi; D Fiorella
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  PC-Based 3D Reconstruction of MR Angiography in Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms. The Value of Pre-Treatment Planning for Embolization and Post-Treatment Follow-up.

Authors:  S W Park; M H Han; S H Cha; B J Kwon; K H Kim; O K Kwon; S K Baik; K H Chang
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-10-20       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils.

Authors:  Charles B L M Majoie; Marieke E Sprengers; Willem Jan J van Rooij; Cristina Lavini; Menno Sluzewski; Jeroen C van Rijn; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: usefulness of 6-month imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Gauvrit; Xavier Leclerc; Mickael Pernodet; Boris Lubicz; Jean-Paul Lejeune; Didier Leys; Jean-Pierre Pruvo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms after endosaccular packing with Guglielmi detachable coils: comparison with 3D digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Mika Okahara; Hiro Kiyosue; Yuzo Hori; Masanori Yamashita; Hirofumi Nagatomi; Hiromu Mori
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Is digital substraction angiography still needed for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by embolisation with detachable coils?

Authors:  Boris Lubicz; Carine Neugroschl; Laurent Collignon; Olivier François; Danielle Balériaux
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.