Literature DB >> 25547920

Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in the right lower quadrant is associated with a lower risk of catheter tip migration: a retrospective single-center study.

Lei Lan1, Jielong Jiang, Peng Wang, Wei Ren, Zhao Hu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a modified technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in the right lower quadrant with respect to catheter tip migration.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 237 patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent implantation of a two-cuff straight-end swan-neck catheter for peritoneal dialysis. Ninety-eight patients received conventional catheter placement in the left quadrant (beside the umbilicus 12-13 cm above the pubic symphysis) with catheter exit site on the left, and 139 patients received modified catheter placement in the right lower quadrant (beside the umbilicus 6-7 cm above the pubic symphysis) with catheter exit site on the right. Dialysate inflow time, dialysate outflow time, ultrafiltration volume, infection, hemorrhage, intestinal obstruction, and catheter tip migration were recorded.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in dialysate inflow time, dialysate outflow time, ultrafiltration volume, infection, hemorrhage, or intestinal obstruction between the conventional and modified groups. Catheter tip migration occurred in 19 (19.3%) of the 98 patients in the conventional group, and in 5 (3.6%) of the 139 patients in the modified group. The frequency of occurrence of catheter tip migration was significantly less in the modified group compared with the conventional group (p < 0.01). In addition, repositioning of the catheter occurred in all five patients with catheter tip migration in the modified group after conservative treatment, whereas 12 patients required surgical repositioning of the catheter in the conventional group.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified technique is superior to the conventional technique in reducing catheter tip migration. This technique can be widely performed in the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25547920     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0899-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  35 in total

1.  Early start of CAPD with the Seldinger technique.

Authors:  Oktay Banli; Hasan Altun; Aysegul Oztemel
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Shorter break-in period is a viable option with tighter PD catheter securing during the insertion.

Authors:  Ajay P Sharma; Anil Mandhani; Shaji P Daniel; Guido Filler
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 3.  The role of peritoneal dialysis in modern renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Catriona Goodlad; Edwina Brown
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Complications after tenckhoff catheter insertion: a single-centre experience using multiple operators over four years.

Authors:  Wen Jiun Liu; Lai Seong Hooi
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 5.  Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  G F M Strippoli; A Tong; D Johnson; F P Schena; J C Craig
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

6.  Immediate initiation of CAPD following percutaneous catheter placement without break-in procedure.

Authors:  Young-Il Jo; Sug Kyun Shin; Jong-Ho Lee; Jong-Oh Song; Jung-Hwan Park
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Impact of break-in period on the short-term outcomes of patients started on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Yaorong Liu; Lin Zhang; Aiwu Lin; Zhaohui Ni; Jiaqi Qian; Wei Fang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 8.  Clinical advantages of peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Bulent Tokgoz
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  A randomized trial comparing conventional swan-neck straight-tip catheters to straight-tip catheters with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck.

Authors:  Chiu-Leong Li; Tai-Gen Cui; Hong-Bing Gan; Kin Cheung; Weng-In Lio; Un-I Kuok
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  A brief recap of tips and surgical manoeuvres to enhance optimal outcome of surgically placed peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Authors:  Jodie H Frost; Atul Bagul
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  The ideal position of the peritoneal dialysis catheter is not always ideal.

Authors:  Tatiana Tanasiychuk; Rafael Selgas; Daniel Kushnir; Muhammad Abd Elhalim; Alon Antebi; Gloria Del Peso; Maria A Bajo; Victor Frajewicki
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Low-site versus traditional peritoneal dialysis catheterization: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Gong; Wei Xu; Weigang Tang; Jingkui Lu; Yani Li; Huaqin Jiang; Hui Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.