Literature DB >> 20590910

Alanine transaminase rather than abdominal ultrasound alone is an important investigation to justify cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis.

Kerry Anderson1, Lisa A Brown, Philip Daniel, Saxon J Connor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate the predictive value of an elevated level of alanine transaminase (ALT) for biliary acute pancreatitis (AP) and to reconsider the role of abdominal ultrasound (AUS).
METHODS: All patients admitted to Christchurch Public Hospital with AP between July 2005 and December 2008 were identified from a prospectively collected database. Peak ALT within 48 h of presentation was recorded. Aetiology was determined on the basis of history, AUS and other relevant investigations.
RESULTS: A total of 543 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with biliary AP had significantly higher median (range) ALT than those with non-biliary causes (200 units/l [63-421 units/l] vs. 33 units/l [18-84 units/l]; P < 0.001). An ALT level of >300 units/l had a sensitivity of 36%, specificity of 94%, positive predictive value of 87% and positive likelihood ratio of 5.6 for gallstones. An elevated ALT and negative AUS had a probability of 21-80% for gallstones.
CONCLUSIONS: An elevated ALT strongly supports a diagnosis of gallstones in AP. Abdominal ultrasound effectively confirms this diagnosis; however, a negative ultrasound in the presence of a raised ALT does not exclude gallstones. In some patients consideration could be given to proceeding to laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on ALT alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20590910      PMCID: PMC2951823          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00173.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  23 in total

Review 1.  The role of US and CT in pancreatitis.

Authors:  Mary Ann Turner
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study.

Authors:  Christophe Aubé; Benoit Delorme; Thierry Yzet; Pascal Burtin; Jérome Lebigot; Patrick Pessaux; Catherine Gondry-Jouet; Jean Boyer; Christine Caron
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Timing of cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis: do the data support current guidelines?

Authors:  Kaori Ito; Hiromichi Ito; Edward E Whang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Clinico-biochemical prediction of biliary cause of acute pancreatitis in the era of endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  C L Liu; S T Fan; C M Lo; W K Tso; Y Wong; R T P Poon; C M Lam; B C Wong; J Wong
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Timing of cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis: outcomes of cholecystectomy on first admission and after recurrent biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Orhan Alimoglu; Orhan V Ozkan; Mustafa Sahin; Adem Akcakaya; Ramazan Eryilmaz; Gurhan Bas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The urgent diagnosis of gallstones in acute pancreatitis: a prospective study of three methods.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; A W Hall; D F Finlay; J M Berry; D L Carr-Locke; D P Fossard
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  How often are liver function tests normal in acute biliary pancreatitis?

Authors:  Kush Dholakia; C S Pitchumoni; N Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Predicting gallstone pancreatitis with laboratory parameters: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Tenner; H Dubner; W Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Enzymatic markers of gallstone-induced pancreatitis identified by ROC curve analysis, discriminant analysis, logistic regression, likelihood ratios, and information theory.

Authors:  S C Kazmierczak; P G Catrou; F Van Lente
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  A P Ainsworth; S R Rafaelsen; P A Wamberg; J Durup; T K Pless; M B Mortensen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  3 in total

1.  Re: Alanine transaminase rather than abdominal ultrasound alone is an important investigation to justify cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Yahya Al-Habbal; Philip Smart
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Use of amylase and alanine transaminase to predict acute gallstone pancreatitis in a population with high HIV prevalence.

Authors:  Zaheer Moolla; Frank Anderson; Sandie R Thomson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  IL-8 gene polymorphism in acute biliary and non biliary pancreatitis: probable cause of high level parameters?

Authors:  Ender Anilir; Filiz Ozen; Ibrahim Halil Yildirim; Ibrahim Ali Ozemir; Can Ozlu; Orhan Alimoglu
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2017-02-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.