Literature DB >> 6141833

The urgent diagnosis of gallstones in acute pancreatitis: a prospective study of three methods.

J P Neoptolemos, A W Hall, D F Finlay, J M Berry, D L Carr-Locke, D P Fossard.   

Abstract

Ultrasonography (US), radionuclide biliary scanning (RBS), and biochemical tests were performed within 72 h of admission in 83 patients with acute pancreatitis in an attempt to define those with gallstones as an aetiological factor. US was 92 per cent accurate in the 80 per cent of patients in whom the gallbladder was demonstrated. There were no false positives. Sixty-seven per cent of patients with gallstones were diagnosed although this improved to 78 per cent when US was repeated following the patients' clinical improvement. The pattern of RBS was completely normal in 46.5 per cent of patients with biliary pancreatitis and 64 per cent of patients with non-biliary pancreatitis. Biochemical tests completely separated 47 per cent of patients with gallstones from those without. Used in combination with US these two methods accurately identified 81 per cent of patients in the biliary group. In conclusion US was found to be a rapid and accurate method of gallstone detection but used alone it has limited usefulness. RBS can be time consuming and was found to be of doubtful value. Biochemical tests were helpful in indicating a proportion of patients who had gallstones which were not detected by US, and therefore have a practical application. Current methods of gallstone detection in patients with acute pancreatitis are far from ideal and further studies are indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6141833     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800710324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  17 in total

Review 1.  Early endoscopic management of acute gallstone pancreatitis--an evidence-based review.

Authors:  A N Barkun
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Detection of biliary origin of acute pancreatitis. Comparison of laboratory tests, ultrasound, computed tomography, and ERCP.

Authors:  J Schölmerich; V Gross; T Johannesson; G Brobmann; K Rückauer; B Wimmer; W Gerok; E H Farthmann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  George Sarosi; Robert V Rege
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy.

Authors:  Capecomorin S Pitchumoni; Balaji Yegneswaran
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Evidence-based approach to idiopathic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Jonathan E Clain; Randall K Pearson
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-04

6.  Detection of gall stones after acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  A J Goodman; J P Neoptolemos; D L Carr-Locke; D B Finlay; D P Fossard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Alanine transaminase rather than abdominal ultrasound alone is an important investigation to justify cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Kerry Anderson; Lisa A Brown; Philip Daniel; Saxon J Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 8.  The clinical problem of biliary acute necrotizing pancreatitis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of biliary necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  C E Forsmark
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Early assessment of severity in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  R C Williamson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Acute biliary pancreatitis: an experience in a tertiary level hospital of Nepal.

Authors:  Sujan Manandhar; Smith Giri; Prakash Poudel; Ramesh Singh Bhandari; Paleswan Joshi Lakhey; Pradeep Vaidya
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.