Literature DB >> 20590332

Recursive expectation-maximization clustering: a method for identifying buffering mechanisms composed of phenomic modules.

Jingyu Guo1, Dehua Tian, Brett A McKinney, John L Hartman.   

Abstract

Interactions between genetic and/or environmental factors are ubiquitous, affecting the phenotypes of organisms in complex ways. Knowledge about such interactions is becoming rate-limiting for our understanding of human disease and other biological phenomena. Phenomics refers to the integrative analysis of how all genes contribute to phenotype variation, entailing genome and organism level information. A systems biology view of gene interactions is critical for phenomics. Unfortunately the problem is intractable in humans; however, it can be addressed in simpler genetic model systems. Our research group has focused on the concept of genetic buffering of phenotypic variation, in studies employing the single-cell eukaryotic organism, S. cerevisiae. We have developed a methodology, quantitative high throughput cellular phenotyping (Q-HTCP), for high-resolution measurements of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions on a genome-wide scale. Q-HTCP is being applied to the complete set of S. cerevisiae gene deletion strains, a unique resource for systematically mapping gene interactions. Genetic buffering is the idea that comprehensive and quantitative knowledge about how genes interact with respect to phenotypes will lead to an appreciation of how genes and pathways are functionally connected at a systems level to maintain homeostasis. However, extracting biologically useful information from Q-HTCP data is challenging, due to the multidimensional and nonlinear nature of gene interactions, together with a relative lack of prior biological information. Here we describe a new approach for mining quantitative genetic interaction data called recursive expectation-maximization clustering (REMc). We developed REMc to help discover phenomic modules, defined as sets of genes with similar patterns of interaction across a series of genetic or environmental perturbations. Such modules are reflective of buffering mechanisms, i.e., genes that play a related role in the maintenance of physiological homeostasis. To develop the method, 297 gene deletion strains were selected based on gene-drug interactions with hydroxyurea, an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase enzyme activity, which is critical for DNA synthesis. To partition the gene functions, these 297 deletion strains were challenged with growth inhibitory drugs known to target different genes and cellular pathways. Q-HTCP-derived growth curves were used to quantify all gene interactions, and the data were used to test the performance of REMc. Fundamental advantages of REMc include objective assessment of total number of clusters and assignment to each cluster a log-likelihood value, which can be considered an indicator of statistical quality of clusters. To assess the biological quality of clusters, we developed a method called gene ontology information divergence z-score (GOid_z). GOid_z summarizes total enrichment of GO attributes within individual clusters. Using these and other criteria, we compared the performance of REMc to hierarchical and K-means clustering. The main conclusion is that REMc provides distinct efficiencies for mining Q-HTCP data. It facilitates identification of phenomic modules, which contribute to buffering mechanisms that underlie cellular homeostasis and the regulation of phenotypic expression. (c) 2010 American Institute of Physics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20590332      PMCID: PMC2909310          DOI: 10.1063/1.3455188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chaos        ISSN: 1054-1500            Impact factor:   3.642


  52 in total

Review 1.  Reverse engineering of biological complexity.

Authors:  Marie E Csete; John C Doyle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.

Authors:  M A Harris; J Clark; A Ireland; J Lomax; M Ashburner; R Foulger; K Eilbeck; S Lewis; B Marshall; C Mungall; J Richter; G M Rubin; J A Blake; C Bult; M Dolan; H Drabkin; J T Eppig; D P Hill; L Ni; M Ringwald; R Balakrishnan; J M Cherry; K R Christie; M C Costanzo; S S Dwight; S Engel; D G Fisk; J E Hirschman; E L Hong; R S Nash; A Sethuraman; C L Theesfeld; D Botstein; K Dolinski; B Feierbach; T Berardini; S Mundodi; S Y Rhee; R Apweiler; D Barrell; E Camon; E Dimmer; V Lee; R Chisholm; P Gaudet; W Kibbe; R Kishore; E M Schwarz; P Sternberg; M Gwinn; L Hannick; J Wortman; M Berriman; V Wood; N de la Cruz; P Tonellato; P Jaiswal; T Seigfried; R White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile.

Authors:  Maya Schuldiner; Sean R Collins; Natalie J Thompson; Vladimir Denic; Arunashree Bhamidipati; Thanuja Punna; Jan Ihmels; Brenda Andrews; Charles Boone; Jack F Greenblatt; Jonathan S Weissman; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  How does gene expression clustering work?

Authors:  Patrik D'haeseleer
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  The language of gene interaction.

Authors:  P C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants.

Authors:  A H Tong; M Evangelista; A B Parsons; H Xu; G D Bader; N Pagé; M Robinson; S Raghibizadeh; C W Hogue; H Bussey; B Andrews; M Tyers; C Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis.

Authors:  E A Winzeler; D D Shoemaker; A Astromoff; H Liang; K Anderson; B Andre; R Bangham; R Benito; J D Boeke; H Bussey; A M Chu; C Connelly; K Davis; F Dietrich; S W Dow; M El Bakkoury; F Foury; S H Friend; E Gentalen; G Giaever; J H Hegemann; T Jones; M Laub; H Liao; N Liebundguth; D J Lockhart; A Lucau-Danila; M Lussier; N M'Rabet; P Menard; M Mittmann; C Pai; C Rebischung; J L Revuelta; L Riles; C J Roberts; P Ross-MacDonald; B Scherens; M Snyder; S Sookhai-Mahadeo; R K Storms; S Véronneau; M Voet; G Volckaert; T R Ward; R Wysocki; G S Yen; K Yu; K Zimmermann; P Philippsen; M Johnston; R W Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The genetic landscape of a cell.

Authors:  Michael Costanzo; Anastasia Baryshnikova; Jeremy Bellay; Yungil Kim; Eric D Spear; Carolyn S Sevier; Huiming Ding; Judice L Y Koh; Kiana Toufighi; Sara Mostafavi; Jeany Prinz; Robert P St Onge; Benjamin VanderSluis; Taras Makhnevych; Franco J Vizeacoumar; Solmaz Alizadeh; Sondra Bahr; Renee L Brost; Yiqun Chen; Murat Cokol; Raamesh Deshpande; Zhijian Li; Zhen-Yuan Lin; Wendy Liang; Michaela Marback; Jadine Paw; Bryan-Joseph San Luis; Ermira Shuteriqi; Amy Hin Yan Tong; Nydia van Dyk; Iain M Wallace; Joseph A Whitney; Matthew T Weirauch; Guoqing Zhong; Hongwei Zhu; Walid A Houry; Michael Brudno; Sasan Ragibizadeh; Balázs Papp; Csaba Pál; Frederick P Roth; Guri Giaever; Corey Nislow; Olga G Troyanskaya; Howard Bussey; Gary D Bader; Anne-Claude Gingras; Quaid D Morris; Philip M Kim; Chris A Kaiser; Chad L Myers; Brenda J Andrews; Charles Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Nobel Lecture. Yeast and cancer.

Authors:  Leland H Hartwell
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2002 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Significant conservation of synthetic lethal genetic interaction networks between distantly related eukaryotes.

Authors:  Scott J Dixon; Yaroslav Fedyshyn; Judice L Y Koh; T S Keshava Prasad; Charly Chahwan; Gordon Chua; Kiana Toufighi; Anastasija Baryshnikova; Jacqueline Hayles; Kwang-Lae Hoe; Dong-Uk Kim; Han-Oh Park; Chad L Myers; Akhilesh Pandey; Daniel Durocher; Brenda J Andrews; Charles Boone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Introduction to focus issue: genetic interactions.

Authors:  Daniel Segrè; Christopher J Marx
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.642

2.  Phenomic assessment of genetic buffering by kinetic analysis of cell arrays.

Authors:  John Rodgers; Jingyu Guo; John L Hartman
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

3.  A yeast phenomic model for the gene interaction network modulating CFTR-ΔF508 protein biogenesis.

Authors:  Raymond J Louie; Jingyu Guo; John W Rodgers; Rick White; Najaf Shah; Silvere Pagant; Peter Kim; Michael Livstone; Kara Dolinski; Brett A McKinney; Jeong Hong; Eric J Sorscher; Jennifer Bryan; Elizabeth A Miller; John L Hartman
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 11.117

4.  Yeast Phenomics: An Experimental Approach for Modeling Gene Interaction Networks that Buffer Disease.

Authors:  John L Hartman; Chandler Stisher; Darryl A Outlaw; Jingyu Guo; Najaf A Shah; Dehua Tian; Sean M Santos; John W Rodgers; Richard A White
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Recursive Indirect-Paths Modularity (RIP-M) for Detecting Community Structure in RNA-Seq Co-expression Networks.

Authors:  Bahareh Rahmani; Michael T Zimmermann; Diane E Grill; Richard B Kennedy; Ann L Oberg; Bill C White; Gregory A Poland; Brett A McKinney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  A Humanized Yeast Phenomic Model of Deoxycytidine Kinase to Predict Genetic Buffering of Nucleoside Analog Cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Sean M Santos; Mert Icyuz; Ilya Pound; Doreen William; Jingyu Guo; Brett A McKinney; Michael Niederweis; John Rodgers; John L Hartman
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  A yeast phenomic model for the influence of Warburg metabolism on genetic buffering of doxorubicin.

Authors:  Sean M Santos; John L Hartman
Journal:  Cancer Metab       Date:  2019-10-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.