Literature DB >> 20585542

Using entropy maximization to understand the determinants of structural dynamics beyond native contact topology.

Timothy R Lezon1, Ivet Bahar.   

Abstract

Comparison of elastic network model predictions with experimental data has provided important insights on the dominant role of the network of inter-residue contacts in defining the global dynamics of proteins. Most of these studies have focused on interpreting the mean-square fluctuations of residues, or deriving the most collective, or softest, modes of motions that are known to be insensitive to structural and energetic details. However, with increasing structural data, we are in a position to perform a more critical assessment of the structure-dynamics relations in proteins, and gain a deeper understanding of the major determinants of not only the mean-square fluctuations and lowest frequency modes, but the covariance or the cross-correlations between residue fluctuations and the shapes of higher modes. A systematic study of a large set of NMR-determined proteins is analyzed using a novel method based on entropy maximization to demonstrate that the next level of refinement in the elastic network model description of proteins ought to take into consideration properties such as contact order (or sequential separation between contacting residues) and the secondary structure types of the interacting residues, whereas the types of amino acids do not play a critical role. Most importantly, an optimal description of observed cross-correlations requires the inclusion of destabilizing, as opposed to exclusively stabilizing, interactions, stipulating the functional significance of local frustration in imparting native-like dynamics. This study provides us with a deeper understanding of the structural basis of experimentally observed behavior, and opens the way to the development of more accurate models for exploring protein dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20585542      PMCID: PMC2887458          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  56 in total

1.  Analysis of domain motions in large proteins.

Authors:  K Hinsen; A Thomas; M J Field
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-02-15

2.  Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  Helen Berman; Kim Henrick; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-12

3.  Can conformational change be described by only a few normal modes?

Authors:  Paula Petrone; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Inferential structure determination.

Authors:  Wolfgang Rieping; Michael Habeck; Michael Nilges
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population.

Authors:  Elad Schneidman; Michael J Berry; Ronen Segev; William Bialek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Coarse-grained biomolecular simulation with REACH: realistic extension algorithm via covariance Hessian.

Authors:  Kei Moritsugu; Jeremy C Smith
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Systematic multiscale parameterization of heterogeneous elastic network models of proteins.

Authors:  Edward Lyman; Jim Pfaendtner; Gregory A Voth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding.

Authors:  J D Bryngelson; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A comparative analysis of the equilibrium dynamics of a designed protein inferred from NMR, X-ray, and computations.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Leonardus M I Koharudin; Angela M Gronenborn; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-12

10.  The MUMO (minimal under-restraining minimal over-restraining) method for the determination of native state ensembles of proteins.

Authors:  Barbara Richter; Joerg Gsponer; Péter Várnai; Xavier Salvatella; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.835

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Pre-existing soft modes of motion uniquely defined by native contact topology facilitate ligand binding to proteins.

Authors:  Lidio Meireles; Mert Gur; Ahmet Bakan; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Modulating Hinge Flexibility in the APP Transmembrane Domain Alters γ-Secretase Cleavage.

Authors:  Alexander Götz; Nadine Mylonas; Philipp Högel; Mara Silber; Hannes Heinel; Simon Menig; Alexander Vogel; Hannes Feyrer; Daniel Huster; Burkhard Luy; Dieter Langosch; Christina Scharnagl; Claudia Muhle-Goll; Frits Kamp; Harald Steiner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Evol and ProDy for bridging protein sequence evolution and structural dynamics.

Authors:  Ahmet Bakan; Anindita Dutta; Wenzhi Mao; Ying Liu; Chakra Chennubhotla; Timothy R Lezon; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Exploring the landscape of model representations.

Authors:  Thomas T Foley; Katherine M Kidder; M Scott Shell; W G Noid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The effects of rigid motions on elastic network model force constants.

Authors:  Timothy R Lezon
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-01-07

6.  ProDy: protein dynamics inferred from theory and experiments.

Authors:  Ahmet Bakan; Lidio M Meireles; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Effective harmonic potentials: insights into the internal cooperativity and sequence-specificity of protein dynamics.

Authors:  Yves Dehouck; Alexander S Mikhailov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Elastic network model of learned maintained contacts to predict protein motion.

Authors:  Ines Putz; Oliver Brock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dissecting conformational changes in APP's transmembrane domain linked to ε-efficiency in familial Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Alexander Götz; Christina Scharnagl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.