OBJECTIVE: To evaluate multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with a triple-bolus contrast administration protocol for preoperative anatomical and functional assessment of living renal donors. METHODS: Fifty-five potential living renal donors underwent MDCT of which 27 proceeded to donor nephrectomy. A triple-bolus contrast administration protocol was used for simultaneous acquisition of arterial, nephrographic, and excretory phases. MDCT images were independently reviewed in random order by two radiologists blinded to surgical anatomy findings. Diagnostic accuracy for anatomical variants was quantified by sensitivity and specificity. Differential renal function (DRF) was derived from MDCT for 54 patients and compared with technetium-99 m dimercaptosuccinic acid renography (Tc-99 m DMSA). RESULTS: All triple-bolus MDCT examinations were technically adequate. Accessory renal arteries and veins were identified at surgery in 33% (n = 9/27) and 22% (n = 6/27) of donor kidneys. The mean difference between MDCT-derived DRF and DMSA was 0.8% (95% CI 0.1-1.6) with 95% limits of agreement of -4.6% (95% CI -3.3 to -5.9) to 6.3% (95% CI 5.0-7.6). MDCT delivered a mean (SD, range) radiation dose of 9.5 (3.6, 3.6-17.3) mSv. CONCLUSION: MDCT with a triple-bolus contrast administration provides accurate anatomical and functional evaluation of living renal donors.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with a triple-bolus contrast administration protocol for preoperative anatomical and functional assessment of living renal donors. METHODS: Fifty-five potential living renal donors underwent MDCT of which 27 proceeded to donor nephrectomy. A triple-bolus contrast administration protocol was used for simultaneous acquisition of arterial, nephrographic, and excretory phases. MDCT images were independently reviewed in random order by two radiologists blinded to surgical anatomy findings. Diagnostic accuracy for anatomical variants was quantified by sensitivity and specificity. Differential renal function (DRF) was derived from MDCT for 54 patients and compared with technetium-99 m dimercaptosuccinic acid renography (Tc-99 m DMSA). RESULTS: All triple-bolus MDCT examinations were technically adequate. Accessory renal arteries and veins were identified at surgery in 33% (n = 9/27) and 22% (n = 6/27) of donor kidneys. The mean difference between MDCT-derived DRF and DMSA was 0.8% (95% CI 0.1-1.6) with 95% limits of agreement of -4.6% (95% CI -3.3 to -5.9) to 6.3% (95% CI 5.0-7.6). MDCT delivered a mean (SD, range) radiation dose of 9.5 (3.6, 3.6-17.3) mSv. CONCLUSION: MDCT with a triple-bolus contrast administration provides accurate anatomical and functional evaluation of living renal donors.
Authors: Stuart G Silverman; Syed A Akbar; Koenraad J Mortele; Kemal Tuncali; Jui G Bhagwat; Julian L Seifter Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ulrich Kramer; Christian Thiel; Achim Seeger; Michael Fenchel; Gerhard Laub; Paul J Finn; Wolfgang Steurer; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Adam L Summerlin; Mark E Lockhart; Andrew M Strang; Peter N Kolettis; Naomi S Fineberg; J Kevin Smith Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Cristina Rossi; Andreas Boss; Ferruh Artunc; Serdar Yildiz; Petros Martirosian; Helmut Dittmann; Claus D Claussen; Nils Heyne; Fritz Schick; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Ilaria Grassi; Cristina Nanni; Vincenzo Allegri; Joshua James Morigi; Gian Carlo Montini; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-12-15