Literature DB >> 11292298

Should the indications for laparascopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindiction to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy.

A K Mandal1, C Cohen, R A Montgomery, L R Kavoussi, L E Ratner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The left kidney is preferred for live donation. In open live donor nephrectomy, the right kidney is selected if the left kidney has multiple renal arteries or anomalous venous drainage. With laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN), there is reluctance to procure the right kidney because of the more difficult exposure and further shortening of the right renal vein (RRV) after a stapled transection. An experience with LLDN is reviewed to determine whether the right kidney should be procured laparoscopically.
METHODS: From February 1995 to November 1999, 227 patients underwent live donor renal transplants with allografts procured by LLDN. The results of these transplants were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 227 kidneys transplanted, 17 (7.5%) were right kidneys. In the early experience, three (37.5%) of the eight right renal allografts developed venous thrombosis, two of which had duplicated RRV. Based on these initially unacceptable results, donor evaluation and LLDN techniques were modified. Spiral computerized tomography (CT) replaced conventional angiography to define better the venous anatomy. LLDN was modified in one of three ways: (1) changing the stapler port placement such that the RRV was transected in a plane parallel to the inferior vena cava, (2) relocation of the incision for open division of RRV, or (3) lengthening of the donor RRV with a panel graft constructed of recipient greater saphenous vein. Finally, the recipient operation enjoined complete mobilization of the left iliac vein with transposition lateral to the iliac artery. With these modifications, there were no vascular complications with the subsequent nine right renal allografts (P<0.05). Of the left kidneys transplanted, 31 had multiple renal arteries, 14 had retroaortic or circumaortic veins, 4 had both multiple arteries and venous anomalies, and 1 had a duplicated IVC draining the left renal vein. There were no vascular complications with left renal allografts that had multiple arteries or venous anomalies.
CONCLUSIONS: LLDN of the left kidney is technically easier. Left kidneys with multiple arteries or anomalous venous drainage are not problematic. The right kidney can be procured with LLDN; however, a rational approach to preoperative angiographic imaging, donor operation, and recipient operation is crucial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11292298     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200103150-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  24 in total

1.  [Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy of kidneys with multiple renal vessels].

Authors:  M Giessing; S Deger; V Ebeling; B Schönberger; J Roigas; T J Kroencke; I Türk
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Li-Ming Su; Lloyd E Ratner; Robert A Montgomery; Thomas W Jarrett; Bruce J Trock; Vladimir Sinkov; Rachel Bluebond-Langner; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  [Ten years of laparoscopic living kidney donation. From an extravagant to a routine procedure].

Authors:  M Giessing; T F Fuller; S Deger; J Roigas; M Tüllmann; L Liefeldt; K Budde; T Fischer; B Winkelmann; D Schnorr; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Current concepts in transplant surgery: laparoscopic living donor of the kidney.

Authors:  Andreas Paul; Jürgen Treckmann; Anja Gallinat; Oliver Witzke; Udo Vester; Christoph E Broelsch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Bilateral Duplication of Renal Vessels: Anatomical, Medical and Surgical perspective.

Authors:  Nasir Syed Mir; Ashfaq Ul Hassan; Riyaz Rangrez; Sajad Hamid; S A Tabish; Zahida Rasool
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2008-07

6.  Right versus left retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Toshiaki Kashiwadate; Kazuaki Tokodai; Noritoshi Amada; Izumi Haga; Tetsuro Takayama; Atsushi Nakamura; Takuya Jimbo; Yasuyuki Hara; Naoki Kawagishi; Noriaki Ohuchi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Maximizing the donor pool: left versus right laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nian Liu; Romel Wazir; Jia Wang; Kun-Jie Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Implantation of Right Kidneys: Is the Risk of Technical Graft Loss Real?

Authors:  Taqi T Khan; Nadeem Ahmad; Kashif Siddique; Konstantinos Fourtounas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Is a Retroaortic Vein a Risk Factor in Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy?

Authors:  Josef Mang; Linda Hennig; Nadine Biernath; Lutz Liefeldt; Anna Bichmann; Bernhard Ralla; Andreas Maxeiner; Robert Peters; Hannes Cash; Klemens Budde; Frank Friedersdorff
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  The mini-incision donor nephrectomy is best suited for Indian patients undergoing live donor nephrectomy: against the motion.

Authors:  Pranjal Modi
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.