PURPOSE: this study developed and tested algorithms to identify outdoor walking trips from portable global positioning system (GPS) units in free-living conditions. METHODS: the study included a calibration and a validation phase. For the calibration phase, we determined the best algorithm from 35 person-days of data. Measures of agreement regarding the daily number and duration of diary-reported and GPS-identified trips were used. In the validation phase, the best algorithm was applied to an additional and separate 136 person-days of diary and GPS data. RESULTS: the preferred algorithm in the calibration phase resulted in 90% of trips identified from the GPS data being found in the diary, whereas 81% of trips reported in the diary being found in the GPS data. The preferred algorithm used 1) a maximum 3-min gap between points to define a trip, 2) at least 5 min or more of continuous GPS points, 3) a speed range between 2 and 8.0 km·h, 4) at least 30 m of displacement between the start and end points of a trip, and 5) merged walking trips when the time gap between trips was less than 3 min. With the validation data, substantial agreement between the GPS and the diary was achieved, with 86% of trips identified from the GPS data found in the diary and 77% of trips reported in the diary found in the GPS data. CONCLUSIONS: the algorithm identified free-living walking trips of more than 5 min in duration. The ability to identify outdoor walking trips from GPS data can be improved by reducing recording intervals used in the GPS units and monitoring participant compliance. Further research is desirable to determine whether concurrent wearing of an accelerometer may improve the ability to detect walking more accurately.
PURPOSE: this study developed and tested algorithms to identify outdoor walking trips from portable global positioning system (GPS) units in free-living conditions. METHODS: the study included a calibration and a validation phase. For the calibration phase, we determined the best algorithm from 35 person-days of data. Measures of agreement regarding the daily number and duration of diary-reported and GPS-identified trips were used. In the validation phase, the best algorithm was applied to an additional and separate 136 person-days of diary and GPS data. RESULTS: the preferred algorithm in the calibration phase resulted in 90% of trips identified from the GPS data being found in the diary, whereas 81% of trips reported in the diary being found in the GPS data. The preferred algorithm used 1) a maximum 3-min gap between points to define a trip, 2) at least 5 min or more of continuous GPS points, 3) a speed range between 2 and 8.0 km·h, 4) at least 30 m of displacement between the start and end points of a trip, and 5) merged walking trips when the time gap between trips was less than 3 min. With the validation data, substantial agreement between the GPS and the diary was achieved, with 86% of trips identified from the GPS data found in the diary and 77% of trips reported in the diary found in the GPS data. CONCLUSIONS: the algorithm identified free-living walking trips of more than 5 min in duration. The ability to identify outdoor walking trips from GPS data can be improved by reducing recording intervals used in the GPS units and monitoring participant compliance. Further research is desirable to determine whether concurrent wearing of an accelerometer may improve the ability to detect walking more accurately.
Authors: Daniel A Rodriguez; Gi-Hyoug Cho; John P Elder; Terry L Conway; Kelly R Evenson; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Elizabeth Shay; Deborah Cohen; Sara Veblen-Mortenson; Julie Pickrell; Leslie Lytle Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2011-05-11
Authors: Peter James; Jennifer Weissman; Jean Wolf; Karen Mumford; Cheryl K Contant; Wei-Ting Hwang; Lynne Taylor; Karen Glanz Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2016-01
Authors: Bumjoon Kang; Anne V Moudon; Philip M Hurvitz; Lucas Reichley; Brian E Saelens Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jordan A Carlson; Brian E Saelens; Jacqueline Kerr; Jasper Schipperijn; Terry L Conway; Lawrence D Frank; Jim E Chapman; Karen Glanz; Kelli L Cain; James F Sallis Journal: Health Place Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Daniel A Rodríguez; Louis Merlin; Carlo G Prato; Terry L Conway; Deborah Cohen; John P Elder; Kelly R Evenson; Thomas L McKenzie; Julie L Pickrel; Sara Veblen-Mortenson Journal: Environ Behav Date: 2015-05-01
Authors: Jordan A Carlson; Marta M Jankowska; Kristin Meseck; Suneeta Godbole; Loki Natarajan; Fredric Raab; Barry Demchak; Kevin Patrick; Jacqueline Kerr Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 5.411