Nancy M Gell1, Dori E Rosenberg2, Jordan Carlson3, Jacqueline Kerr4, Basia Belza5. 1. Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: ngell@uvm.edu. 2. Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. 4. Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA; Center for Wireless & Population Health Systems, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. 5. Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Health Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding factors which may promote walking in mid-life and older adults with mobility impairments is key given the association between physical activity and positive health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between active trips and objective measures of the home neighborhood built environment. METHODS: Global positioning systems (GPS) data collected on 28 adults age 50+ with mobility disabilities were analyzed for active trips from home. Objective and geographic information systems (GIS) derived measures included Walk Score, population density, street connectivity, crime rates, and slope within the home neighborhood. For this cross-sectional observational study, we conducted mean comparisons between participants who took active trips from home and those who did not for the objective measures. Effect sizes were calculated to assess the magnitude of group differences. RESULTS: Nine participants (32%) took active trips from home. Walking in the home neighborhood was significantly associated with GIS derived measures (Walk Score, population density, and street density; effect sizes 0.9-1.2). Participants who used the home neighborhood for active trips had less slope within 1 km of home but the difference was not significant (73.5 m ± 22 vs. 100.8 m ± 38.1, p = 0.06, d = 0.8). There were no statistically significant differences in mean scores for crime rates between those with active trips from home and those without. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide preliminary evidence that more walkable environments promote active mobility among mid-life and older adults with mobility disabilities. The data suggest that this population can and does use active transportation modes when the built environment is supportive.
BACKGROUND: Understanding factors which may promote walking in mid-life and older adults with mobility impairments is key given the association between physical activity and positive health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between active trips and objective measures of the home neighborhood built environment. METHODS: Global positioning systems (GPS) data collected on 28 adults age 50+ with mobility disabilities were analyzed for active trips from home. Objective and geographic information systems (GIS) derived measures included Walk Score, population density, street connectivity, crime rates, and slope within the home neighborhood. For this cross-sectional observational study, we conducted mean comparisons between participants who took active trips from home and those who did not for the objective measures. Effect sizes were calculated to assess the magnitude of group differences. RESULTS: Nine participants (32%) took active trips from home. Walking in the home neighborhood was significantly associated with GIS derived measures (Walk Score, population density, and street density; effect sizes 0.9-1.2). Participants who used the home neighborhood for active trips had less slope within 1 km of home but the difference was not significant (73.5 m ± 22 vs. 100.8 m ± 38.1, p = 0.06, d = 0.8). There were no statistically significant differences in mean scores for crime rates between those with active trips from home and those without. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide preliminary evidence that more walkable environments promote active mobility among mid-life and older adults with mobility disabilities. The data suggest that this population can and does use active transportation modes when the built environment is supportive.
Authors: Dustin T Duncan; Ichiro Kawachi; S V Subramanian; Jared Aldstadt; Steven J Melly; David R Williams Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: F B Hu; R J Sigal; J W Rich-Edwards; G A Colditz; C G Solomon; W C Willett; F E Speizer; J E Manson Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-10-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Philippa Clarke; Jennifer A Ailshire; Michael Bader; Jeffrey D Morenoff; James S House Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jennifer Weuve; Jae Hee Kang; JoAnn E Manson; Monique M B Breteler; James H Ware; Francine Grodstein Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-09-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ryosuke Shigematsu; James F Sallis; Terry L Conway; Brian E Saelens; Lawrence D Frank; Kelli L Cain; James E Chapman; Abby C King Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: William C Goedel; Sari L Reisner; Aron C Janssen; Tonia C Poteat; Seann D Regan; Noah T Kreski; Gladyne Confident; Dustin T Duncan Journal: Transgend Health Date: 2017-07-01
Authors: Colin A Depp; Jesse Bashem; Raeanne C Moore; Jason L Holden; Tanya Mikhael; Joel Swendsen; Philip D Harvey; Eric L Granholm Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2019-11-08
Authors: Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler; Andrea Z LaCroix; Michael J LaMonte; Jingmin Liu; Jason E Maddock; Chad D Rethorst; Chloe E Bird; Marcia L Stefanick; JoAnn E Manson Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2022-07-28
Authors: Dustin T Duncan; Julie Méline; Yan Kestens; Kristen Day; Brian Elbel; Leonardo Trasande; Basile Chaix Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 3.390