Literature DB >> 12389207

Redefining the tonotopic core of rat auditory cortex: physiological evidence for a posterior field.

Neot N Doron1, Joseph E Ledoux, Malcolm N Semple.   

Abstract

Previous physiological studies have identified a tonotopically organized primary auditory cortical field (AI) in the rat. Some of this prior research suggests that the rat, like other mammals, may have additional fields surrounding AI. We, therefore, recorded in the Sprague-Dawley rat extracellular responses of single neurons throughout AI, and continued posteriorly to verify the existence of a posterior field (P) and to compare the neuronal properties in the two regions. Acoustic stimuli, including tones, bandpass noise, broadband noise, and temporally modulated stimuli, were delivered dichotically via sealed systems. Consistent with previous findings, AI was characterized by an anterior-to-posterior tonotopic progression from high to low frequencies (ranging from >40 kHz to <1 kHz). A frequency reversal at the posterior border of AI marked entry into a second core tonotopic region, P, with progressively higher frequencies encountered further posteriorly, up to a point (approximately 8 kHz) where cells were no longer tone responsive. Nevertheless, bandpass noise was an effective stimulus in P, enabling characterization of cells up to 15 kHz. Compared with AI, the frequency tuning of response areas was relatively broader in P, the response latency was often longer and more variable, and the response magnitude was more commonly a nonmonotonic function of stimulus level. In both fields, most neurons were binaurally influenced. The presence of multiple auditory cortical fields in the rat is consistent with auditory cortical organization in other mammals. Moreover, the response properties of P relative to AI in the rat also resemble those found in other mammals. Finally, the physiological data suggest that core auditory cortex (temporal area TE1) is composed not only of AI as previously thought, but also of at least two other subdivisions, P and an anterior field (A). Furthermore, our physiological characterization of TE1 reveals that it is larger than suggested by previous anatomical characterizations. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12389207     DOI: 10.1002/cne.10412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  81 in total

1.  Activation of cerebral cortex during acoustic challenge or acute foot-shock in freely moving, nontethered rats.

Authors:  D P Holschneider; J-M I Maarek; J Yang; J Harimoto; O U Scremin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Reorganization in processing of spectral and temporal input in the rat posterior auditory field induced by environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Specialization of binaural responses in ventral auditory cortices.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Douglas A Storace; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Discrete coding of stimulus value, reward expectation, and reward prediction error in the dorsal striatum.

Authors:  Kei Oyama; Yukina Tateyama; István Hernádi; Philippe N Tobler; Toshio Iijima; Ken-Ichiro Tsutsui
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural spike-timing patterns vary with sound shape and periodicity in three auditory cortical fields.

Authors:  Christopher M Lee; Ahmad F Osman; Maxim Volgushev; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Associative learning shapes the neural code for stimulus magnitude in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Marc A Heiser; David T Blake; Christoph E Schreiner; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Encoding of learned importance of sound by magnitude of representational area in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Richard G Rutkowski; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Fine functional organization of auditory cortex revealed by Fourier optical imaging.

Authors:  Valery A Kalatsky; Daniel B Polley; Michael M Merzenich; Christoph E Schreiner; Michael P Stryker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Auditory responses and stimulus-specific adaptation in rat auditory cortex are preserved across NREM and REM sleep.

Authors:  Yuval Nir; Vladyslav V Vyazovskiy; Chiara Cirelli; Matthew I Banks; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Auditory response properties of neurons in the tectal longitudinal column of the rat.

Authors:  Allen F Marshall; James M Pearson; Stephanie E Falk; John D Skaggs; William D Crocker; Enrique Saldaña; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.