OBJECTIVES: To determine whether mean leukocyte telomere length (LTL) serves as a biomarker of disability assessed according to activities of daily living (ADLs) and what factors may modify this relationship. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: A subset of the National Long Term Care Survey (NTLCS), a Medicare-based U.S. population longitudinal study focused on trends of overall health and functional status in older adults. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred and twenty-four individuals from the 1999 wave of the NTLCS cohort. MEASUREMENTS: Relative LTL determined according to quantitative polymerase chain reaction. LTL has previously been shown to correlate with common age-related disorders and mortality, as well as with socioeconomic status. RESULTS: A sex difference in LTL was observed but not age-dependent shortening or association with socioeconomic status. LTL was associated with disability and functional status assessed according to ADLs. The association between ADLs and LTL was stronger in subjects without diabetes mellitus, whereas associations were not seen when only subjects with diabetes mellitus were analyzed. Associations between LTL and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer were also present in the group without diabetes mellitus but not in the group with diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: These findings support the concept that LTL is a biomarker of overall well-being that is predictive of disability of older individuals in the U.S. population. Diabetes mellitus plays an important role as a modifier of the association between LTL and disability, CVD, and cancer. These associations have clinical implications because of the potential predictive value of LTL and deserve further investigation.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether mean leukocyte telomere length (LTL) serves as a biomarker of disability assessed according to activities of daily living (ADLs) and what factors may modify this relationship. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: A subset of the National Long Term Care Survey (NTLCS), a Medicare-based U.S. population longitudinal study focused on trends of overall health and functional status in older adults. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred and twenty-four individuals from the 1999 wave of the NTLCS cohort. MEASUREMENTS: Relative LTL determined according to quantitative polymerase chain reaction. LTL has previously been shown to correlate with common age-related disorders and mortality, as well as with socioeconomic status. RESULTS: A sex difference in LTL was observed but not age-dependent shortening or association with socioeconomic status. LTL was associated with disability and functional status assessed according to ADLs. The association between ADLs and LTL was stronger in subjects without diabetes mellitus, whereas associations were not seen when only subjects with diabetes mellitus were analyzed. Associations between LTL and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer were also present in the group without diabetes mellitus but not in the group with diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: These findings support the concept that LTL is a biomarker of overall well-being that is predictive of disability of older individuals in the U.S. population. Diabetes mellitus plays an important role as a modifier of the association between LTL and disability, CVD, and cancer. These associations have clinical implications because of the potential predictive value of LTL and deserve further investigation.
Authors: A Benetos; K Okuda; M Lajemi; M Kimura; F Thomas; J Skurnick; C Labat; K Bean; A Aviv Journal: Hypertension Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Scott Brouilette; Ravi K Singh; John R Thompson; Alison H Goodall; Nilesh J Samani Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2003-03-20 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Blanche P Alter; Gabriela M Baerlocher; Sharon A Savage; Stephen J Chanock; Babette B Weksler; Judith P Willner; June A Peters; Neelam Giri; Peter M Lansdorp Journal: Blood Date: 2007-04-27 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Omer T Njajou; Wen-Chi Hsueh; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Anne B Newman; Shih-Hsuan Wu; Rongling Li; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara M Harris; Steve R Cummings; Richard M Cawthon Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo; Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas; Mariam El Assar; Javier Angulo; José A Carnicero; Stefan Walter; Francisco J García-García Journal: Geroscience Date: 2020-11-15 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Kristine M Erlandson; Amanda A Allshouse; Catherine M Jankowski; Eric J Lee; Kevin M Rufner; Brent E Palmer; Cara C Wilson; Samantha MaWhinney; Wendy M Kohrt; Thomas B Campbell Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Tony Robertson; G David Batty; Geoff Der; Candida Fenton; Paul G Shiels; Michaela Benzeval Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Tony Robertson; G David Batty; Geoff Der; Michael J Green; Liane M McGlynn; Alan McIntyre; Paul G Shiels; Michaela Benzeval Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-23 Impact factor: 3.240