Literature DB >> 20578247

Local regulation of human breast xenograft models.

Jodie M Fleming1, Tyler C Miller, Matthew J Meyer, Erika Ginsburg, Barbara K Vonderhaar.   

Abstract

Breast cancer studies implant human cancer cells under the renal capsule, subcutaneously, or orthotopically and often use estrogen supplementation and immune suppressants (etoposide) in xenograft mouse models. However, cell behavior is significantly impacted by signals from the local microenvironment. Therefore, we investigated how the combinatorial effect of the location of injection and procedural differences affected xenograft characteristics. Patient-derived breast cancer cells were injected into mouse abdominal or thoracic mammary glands +/- estrogen and/or etoposide pretreatment. Abdominal xenografts had increased tumor incidence and volume, and decreased latency (P < 0.001) compared to thoracic tumors. No statistically significant difference in tumor volume was found in abdominal xenografts treated +/- estrogen or etoposide; however, etoposide suppressed tumor volume in thoracic xenografts (P < 0.02). The combination of estrogen and etoposide significantly decreased tumor incidence in both sites. In addition, mice treated +/- estradiol were injected orthotopically or subcutaneously with well-characterized breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, ZR75-1, MDA MB-231, or MCF10Ca1h). Orthotopic injection increased tumor volume; growth varied with estrogen supplementation. Location also altered methylation status of several breast cancer-related gene promoters. Lastly, vascularization of orthotopic tumors was significantly enhanced compared to subcutaneous tumors. These data suggest that optimal xenograft success occurs with orthotopic abdominal injections and illustrate molecular details of the compelling influence of the local microenvironment on in vivo models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20578247      PMCID: PMC2897719          DOI: 10.1002/jcp.22190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  56 in total

1.  Reconstruction of functionally normal and malignant human breast tissues in mice.

Authors:  Charlotte Kuperwasser; Tony Chavarria; Min Wu; Greg Magrane; Joe W Gray; Loucinda Carey; Andrea Richardson; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Methylation patterns of the E-cadherin 5' CpG island are unstable and reflect the dynamic, heterogeneous loss of E-cadherin expression during metastatic progression.

Authors:  J R Graff; E Gabrielson; H Fujii; S B Baylin; J G Herman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Progesterone receptors in normal mammary glands of mice: characterization and relationship to development.

Authors:  S Z Haslam; G Shyamala
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  Effect of oestradiol on progesterone receptors in normal mammary glands and its relationship with lactation.

Authors:  S Z Haslam; G Shyamala
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1979-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Growth of human normal and neoplastic mammary tissues in the cleared mammary fat pad of the nude mouse.

Authors:  H C Outzen; R P Custer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Preferential growth of mammary tumors in intact mammary fatpads.

Authors:  F R Miller; D Medina; G H Heppner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Epithelial-stromal interactions in the mouse and human mammary gland in vivo.

Authors:  Hema Parmar; Gerald R Cunha
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.678

8.  Induction of mammary gland carcinomas by the subcutaneous injection of 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea.

Authors:  H J Thompson; L D Meeker
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Relationship between organization of mammary tumors and the ability of tumor cells to replicate mammary tumor virus and to recognize growth-inhibitory contact signals in vitro.

Authors:  C M McGrath; S Nandi; L Young
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Models of breast cancer: quo vadis, animal modeling?

Authors:  Kay-Uwe Wagner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Patient-Derived Xenograft Models in Breast Cancer Research.

Authors:  Deukchae Na; Hyeong-Gon Moon
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Nuclear Localized LSR: A Novel Regulator of Breast Cancer Behavior and Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Denise K Reaves; Katherine A Hoadley; Katerina D Fagan-Solis; Dereje D Jima; Michael Bereman; Lynnelle Thorpe; Jyla Hicks; David McDonald; Melissa A Troester; Charles M Perou; Jodie M Fleming
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 5.852

3.  Endocrine-therapy-resistant ESR1 variants revealed by genomic characterization of breast-cancer-derived xenografts.

Authors:  Shunqiang Li; Dong Shen; Jieya Shao; Robert Crowder; Wenbin Liu; Aleix Prat; Xiaping He; Shuying Liu; Jeremy Hoog; Charles Lu; Li Ding; Obi L Griffith; Christopher Miller; Dave Larson; Robert S Fulton; Michelle Harrison; Tom Mooney; Joshua F McMichael; Jingqin Luo; Yu Tao; Rodrigo Goncalves; Christopher Schlosberg; Jeffrey F Hiken; Laila Saied; Cesar Sanchez; Therese Giuntoli; Caroline Bumb; Crystal Cooper; Robert T Kitchens; Austin Lin; Chanpheng Phommaly; Sherri R Davies; Jin Zhang; Megha Shyam Kavuri; Donna McEachern; Yi Yu Dong; Cynthia Ma; Timothy Pluard; Michael Naughton; Ron Bose; Rama Suresh; Reida McDowell; Loren Michel; Rebecca Aft; William Gillanders; Katherine DeSchryver; Richard K Wilson; Shaomeng Wang; Gordon B Mills; Ana Gonzalez-Angulo; John R Edwards; Christopher Maher; Charles M Perou; Elaine R Mardis; Matthew J Ellis
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 4.  Role of dietary bioactive natural products in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Ji Bak; Soumyasri Das Gupta; Joseph Wahler; Nanjoo Suh
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 5.  One mouse, one patient paradigm: New avatars of personalized cancer therapy.

Authors:  Prerna Malaney; Santo V Nicosia; Vrushank Davé
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  ADAM12 produced by tumor cells rather than stromal cells accelerates breast tumor progression.

Authors:  Camilla Fröhlich; Camilla Nehammer; Reidar Albrechtsen; Pauliina Kronqvist; Marie Kveiborg; Atsuko Sehara-Fujisawa; Arthur M Mercurio; Ulla M Wewer
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 7.  Patient-derived tumor xenografts: transforming clinical samples into mouse models.

Authors:  Despina Siolas; Gregory J Hannon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Retained or altered expression of major histocompatibility complex class I in patient-derived xenograft models in breast cancer.

Authors:  In Hye Song; Young-Ae Kim; Hyeonjin Lee; Hye Seon Park; In Ah Park; Chan Kyu Sim; Myeong Sup Lee; Gyungyub Gong; Hee Jin Lee
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.829

9.  Facile Engineering of Long-Term Culturable Ex Vivo Vascularized Tissues Using Biologically Derived Matrices.

Authors:  Michael Hu; Amir Dailamy; Xin Yi Lei; Udit Parekh; Daniella McDonald; Aditya Kumar; Prashant Mali
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 9.933

10.  Oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer metastasis to bone: inhibition by targeting the bone microenvironment in vivo.

Authors:  I Holen; M Walker; F Nutter; A Fowles; C A Evans; C L Eaton; P D Ottewell
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.